Search for: "Providence Health & Services, Appellant V. Department Of Health, Respondent" Results 121 - 140 of 360
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The full text of the Appellate Division's decision is set out below:  Arrigo v DiNapoli 2022 NY Slip Op 02845 Decided on April 28, 2022 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The full text of the Appellate Division's decision is set out below:  Arrigo v DiNapoli 2022 NY Slip Op 02845 Decided on April 28, 2022 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:25 pm by NL
Therefore, following R(M) v Hammersmith, and as Children's Services had not had any contact with TG, the accommodation provided by the housing department could not be classed as being under s.20 Children Act. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:25 pm by NL
Therefore, following R(M) v Hammersmith, and as Children's Services had not had any contact with TG, the accommodation provided by the housing department could not be classed as being under s.20 Children Act. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 11:36 am by Pamela Wolf
On August 12, 2021, Maine’s Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and its Center for Disease Control (CDC) issued an emergency rule adding COVID-19 to the list of diseases against which healthcare workers must be vaccinated. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 11:36 am by Pamela Wolf
On August 12, 2021, Maine’s Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and its Center for Disease Control (CDC) issued an emergency rule adding COVID-19 to the list of diseases against which healthcare workers must be vaccinated. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
Proof of service outside the state shall be by affidavit of the individual who made the service. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 6:12 am by Joel R. Brandes
Thereafter, relying almost exclusively upon proof that it elicited, Family Court ordered that respondent be placed with the Office of Children and Family Services until August 31, 2011. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 5:40 am
Arbitrator Barry noted that although pursuant to VTL Sec. 313, a policy may not be canceled retroactively, the insurance carrier may assert the fraudulent procurement of the policy by the assignor in an action by a health care provider assignee for no-fault benefits. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
SC07-2138 MARK DEAN SCHWAB, Appellant, v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
SC07-2138 MARK DEAN SCHWAB, Appellant, v. [read post]