Search for: "Provost v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 54
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
United States—”anticanonical,” but not infamous.Perhaps he avoided the language of infamy because his analysis was empirical, rather than normative. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Yesterday’s decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia is the latest twist in Michael Flynn’s prosecution for lying to federal agents about his contacts with Russia’s ambassador to the U.S. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 10:47 am by Ashby Jones
” Located 120 miles north of Buffalo, NY, Canada is, according to Dorman, “a nation with a government and laws distinct from those of the United States. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 11:20 am by Colin Murray
Many of the cases which outlined the requirements of impartial investigation (like the Jordan case cited above, but including McKerr v United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, Kelly and Others v  United Kingdom, no. 30054/96 and Shanaghan v United Kingdom, no. 37715/97) involved the UK directly (and particularly its security operations in Northern Ireland). [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:00 am by INFORRM
While Justice Thomas has cast some doubt on this form of analysis in his opinion in Reed v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 1:54 pm by Jim Martin
United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919), which outlined the limits of free speech, particularly in war time. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 6:00 am by Terry Hart
Solicitor General to participate in oral argument as an amicus in the case of Unicolors v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 6:00 am by Terry Hart
Solicitor General to participate in oral argument as an amicus in the case of Unicolors v. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 4:28 pm by Betsy McKenzie
Holder (Supreme Court)The Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA) moves some foreign works that had been in the public domain in the United States into copyright, by extending the copyright on the titles retroactively. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 11:42 am by Robert George
For example, this past summer when the Supreme Court of the United States handed down its decision in the Dobbs case, reversing Roe v. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 5:58 pm by Josh Blackman
We cannot, nor would we, fire Professor Rasmusen for his posts as a private citizen, as vile and stupid as they are, because the First Amendment of the United States Constitution forbids us to do so. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 5:37 pm
Demonstrate familiarity with the legal regulation of CSR in the United States and selected other states, with a focus on the law of charitable giving and the emerging disclosure and reporting laws4. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 3:35 pm by Lee E. Berlik
The plaintiff was born in Nigeria and emigrated to the United States, where he is now a permanent resident. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 6:40 am
 Standing is `an essential and unchanging part of the case-or-controversy requirement of Article III of the United States Constitution. [read post]