Search for: "Public Citizen v. FTC"
Results 61 - 80
of 164
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2024, 5:52 am
FTC, 710 F.2d 1165, 1178 (6th Cir.1983) (so stating in opposition to sealing generally). [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am
A German citizen has brought a lawsuit against the European Commission alleging violations of the EU GDPR. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 10:50 am
(See FTC v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 5:25 pm
In the case of K.U. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 12:56 pm
Mount Holly Gardens Citizens in Action, in which the Court will consider whether disparate impact claims are available under the Fair Housing Act; Ray Haluch Gravel Co. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 8:11 am
Greater Baltimore Center for Pregnancy Concerns, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:21 pm
Public Citizen, 749 F.3d 246, 273 (4th Cir. 2014). [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 10:24 am
EPIC v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 2:01 pm
FTC v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:56 am
Pitt, Public & Int’l Affairs), Greg Nojeim (CDT), Charles Palmer (IBM), Lydia Parnes (Wilson Sonsini & ex-FTC), Christopehr Pierson (Citizens Financial Group/RBS), Jules Polonetsky (Future of Privacy Forum), John Sabo (CA Technologies), Ho Sik Shin (Millennial Media, Inc), Lisa J.Sotto (Hunton & Williams), Barry Steinhard (Privacy International, ex-ACLU).It seems as if the DPIAC will have a busy fall. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:54 am
The Authority has rulemaking, investigatory, and enforcement power—core governmental powers that are not available to ordinary citizens. 15 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 9:22 am
I hope someday we’ll understand what it means. * FTC v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:01 am
” (Public Citizen? [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
As the Tenth Circuit said in FTC v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 9:16 am
Ever since County of Riverside v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 7:25 am
* the images of Marilyn Monroe and Albert Einstein are moving closer to the public domain [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 8:31 am
Allison Zieve, Director, Public Citizen Litigation Group/Director, FDLI Board Bartlett v. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 8:41 am
Minnesota Statutes § 617.261 is a representation of this constitutional compromise and adequately balances the fundamental right to free speech with the citizens’ right to health and safety. * “Bringing Dark Patterns to Light” FTC Workshop Public Comment * Brown v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 1:24 am
On October 6, 2015, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruled in Schrems v. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 8:21 am
Matter of Public Concern. [read post]