Search for: "Public Service, Etc. v. Public Util., Etc."
Results 41 - 60
of 314
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2010, 12:14 pm
[Post by Venkat] Ferrington v. [read post]
27 Oct 2012, 8:47 am
Aereo defends, relying primarily on the 2d Circuit’s Cablevision case from several years ago (which I was also involved in, and which I blogged about here), which held that a cable system’s DVR service (which did more-or-less what Aereo is doing, except for cable programming rather than over-the-air broadcasts) was NOT infringing copyright because the service, which allowed individual users to utilize “their own” recordings, was not… [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 5:42 pm
The Thursday statement from the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) said only providers who wanted to offer services to the public would need to submit security assessments, suggesting that firms working on enterprise-facing products would be given leeway. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:24 am
[Post by Venkat] McMillen v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 8:21 am
Filers that submit Form 395 can satisfy this requirement by completing Section V of Form 395 and need not submit a separate report. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:24 am
We should also keep an eye out for the appeal to the Upper Tribunal in Fish Legal and Shirley v IC and United Utilities Water plc and others, due to be heard in early 2012 – in which the Smartsource decision stands to be reviewed. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
Of course, there is still the question whether the restriction caused by these seditious offences is no more than necessary to limit the right to freedom of expression and of publication, etc. [read post]
Suffolk University Law School IP Center, Fourth Annual Intellectual Property & Innovation Conference
30 Sep 2022, 8:21 am
Apple v Samsung changed perceptions. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 3:15 pm
For example, an insured business can be reimbursed for the extra expense it incurred to purchase power from a public utility until its alternative power-generating equipment is repaired or replaced. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 5:00 pm
” This important comment in the SCC’s 2015 CBC v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 6:30 am
• Beye v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:17 am
Second, various public expenditures, including employee benefits and medical care, utilities, legal work, insurance, supplies and equipment, and various contracted services, are often borne by various other agencies in government, which might understate public costs by 30%–40%. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 4:54 pm
Mazer v. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 1:46 pm
On July 17, 2023, the Ninth Circuit issued its opinion in Hunley v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 12:45 pm
There is a functionality screen in utility patent: utility. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 1:38 pm
GlaxoSmithKline LLC v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 11:39 am
Spanish, salsa dancing, cooking, etc.) [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:21 pm
. ________________________________________ LANDLORD'S WAIVER: "A MUST DOCUMENT" By Barry V. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 12:56 pm
There is a presumption of freedom to build on land (subject to planning etc etc). [read post]
