Search for: "Purcell v. Smith"
Results 1 - 10
of 10
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2023, 10:31 am
In Employment Division v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 4:20 am
” “Here, the defendants met their burden by establishing, prima facie, that they did not fail to exercise the requisite skill and knowledge in their representation of the plaintiff (see Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP v Telecommunications Sys., Inc. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 3:44 am
” “Here, the plaintiff failed to state causes of action sounding in breach of contract, legal malpractice, breach of fiduciary duty, and fraud, as she failed to adequately allege the element of [*2]damages with respect to each of those causes of action (see Denisco v Uysal, 195 AD3d 989 [2021]; McSpedon v Levine, 158 AD3d 618, 621 [2018]; Bua v Purcell & Ingrao, P.C., 99 AD3d 843, 848 [2012]; Smith v Chase… [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 8:10 pm
Citing the court’s 2006 decision in Purcell v. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 3:58 am
Here, the plaintiff failed to state causes of action sounding in breach of contract, legal malpractice, breach of fiduciary duty, and fraud, as she failed to adequately allege the element of [*2]damages with respect to each of those causes of action (see Denisco v Uysal, 195 AD3d 989; McSpedon v Levine, 158 AD3d 618, 621; Bua v Purcell & Ingrao, P.C., 99 AD3d 843, 848; Smith v Chase Manhattan Bank, USA, 293 AD2d 598,… [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 8:12 am
Smith v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 3:44 am
Requiring an applicant to fill out new I-9 form on tight deadline (Smith v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 2:32 pm
(relisted after the October 14 conference) Summarily Decided Relists Purcell v. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am
A decision from a Seattle area trial court sustained a challenge similar to the Utah challenge to an expert witness proffered by plaintiffs’ firm Brayton Purcell. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:20 pm
Ridpath A, Reddy V, Layton M, et al. [read post]
