Search for: "Purdy v. Purdy" Results 1 - 20 of 109
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2022, 6:07 am by David Pocklington
Introduction of Lord Falconer’s Bill, and summary of Ross v Switzerland [2013] ECHR 429. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Jedediah Britton-Purdy David Singh Grewal Thanks to Jack Balkin for letting us comment on his Cycles of Constitutional Time. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 2:09 pm by Donald Dinnie
The Appellate Division in Lever v Purdy recognised a third exemption to the strict liability of the owner of a domestic animal, that is where a third party (who is not the owner) in charge or control of the animal by their negligent conduct failed to prevent the animal from causing harm to the victim. [read post]
15 May 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
Balkin, Democracy and Dysfunction (University of Chicago Press, 2019).Jedediah Britton-Purdy[*]This long post sketches two thoughts prompted by time with the wide-ranging, provocative, and fecund letters that make up Democracy and Dysfunction. [read post]
1 May 2019, 7:30 am by Bill Purdy
Then much hemming and hawing ensued with citations to Dixie Dairies Corp. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
A nice summary of the meaning of these requirements in the context of criminal law provisions was provided by Lord Hope in R (Purdy) v Director of Public Prosecutions [2010] 1 AC 345, at paragraph 41: Accessibility means that an individual must know from the wording of the relevant provision and, if need be, with the assistance of the court’s interpretation of it what acts and omissions will make him criminally liable: see also Gülmez v Turkey… [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:05 pm
The Ninth Circuit continues its apparent vacation -- only one published opinion since December 28, 2018 -- but. fortunately, the California Court of Appeal continues to crank things out.This opinion takes a very restrictive view of the litigation privilege. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
If we read the cases that build this new commercial speech doctrine, cases like Virginia Pharmacy and IMS v. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 12:00 am by Smita Ghosh
Lincoln’s Trident: The West Gulf Blockading Squadron during the Civil War; William Davenport Mercer’s Diminishing the Bill of Rights: Barron v. [read post]