Search for: "Query v. United States"
Results 81 - 100
of 727
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2022, 11:00 pm
There are 26 federative states (and the federal district) in Brazil, each of which have the powers to adopt their own Constitutions and laws, subject to the rules and principles provided for under the Federal Constitution. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 7:48 am
Wade in Dobbs v. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 1:51 pm
From Luo v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 11:35 am
In August, The Trace presented a conspiracy about the amicus briefs filed in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 1:01 am
In particular, does it relate to: (i) the Union of the Kingdoms of Scotland and England; and/or (ii) the Parliament of the United Kingdom? [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 1:44 pm
On the docket for the United States Supreme Court this term is Gonzalez v. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 1:00 pm
From the Complaint filed Sept. 12 in Konnech Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 3:33 pm
United States English. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 12:20 pm
As such, relevant queries were raised but without a conclusive answer for the time being:Can virtual designs be protected under Article 3 of the Community Design Regulation (CDR)? [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 10:30 am
See United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 4:40 pm
” This is the former president of the United States, he says. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 10:22 pm
United States does not apply to Fog’s surveillance. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 10:21 pm
It claims to process over 250 million devices per month within the United States. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 12:58 pm
It would try and block its use at the state and local police levels by tying the ability to get federal monies in grant funding to the state agreement to ban use of biometric technology in its jurisdiction. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Community for Creative Non-Violence, 466 U.S. 288, 293 (1984) ("[w]e assume for present purposes, but do not decide," whether "overnight sleeping in connection with [a] demonstration is expressive conduct protected to some extent by the First Amendment"), but FAIR appears to have settled it. [2] United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
From that it follows that it is impermissible to base state policies on claimsabout the divine will. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
In Federalist No. 2, John Jay, writing of course as Publius, asserted that the Constitution had to be ratified, or else the unity of the United States, such as it was, would be lost. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 1:02 pm
Outside the United States, cases like the U.K. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 11:08 am
In the United States, we don’t have a comprehensive legal framework at the federal level for protecting people’s data privacy. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 5:55 am
And in United States v. [read post]
