Search for: "Query v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 728
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2022, 6:54 am
Subsequently, harder, thematic due diligence requirements have taken form through new measures on forced labour in the United States, legislation on child labour and conflict minerals due diligence passed in Switzerland, and proposals for EU batteries and deforestation regulations. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 1:06 am by familoo
Last week saw promulgation of Gallagher v Gallagher (No.1) (Reporting Restrictions) [2022] EWFC 52, a summary of which you can find here. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 3:45 pm by Bennett Cyphers
The service allows Babel’s clients to query a database of app-derived location data. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 11:15 am by Marina Wilson
It currently still holds 6.72% of the search market share in the United States, followed by Yahoo at 2.92%. [read post]
24 May 2022, 5:01 am by George Croner
In those investigations, the government can continue to apply to the FISC for an order to obtain “any tangible thing” that is “relevant” to (a) “an investigation to obtain foreign intelligence information not concerning a United States person or” (b) “to protect against international terrorism or clandestine intelligence activities. [read post]
24 May 2022, 5:01 am by George Croner
In those investigations, the government can continue to apply to the FISC for an order to obtain “any tangible thing” that is “relevant” to (a) “an investigation to obtain foreign intelligence information not concerning a United States person or” (b) “to protect against international terrorism or clandestine intelligence activities. [read post]
6 May 2022, 8:00 am by Gene Takagi
Notable Events of the Week: “The Supreme Court has voted to strike down the landmark Roe v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm by Bernard Bell
United States Citizenship & Immigration Services. 407 F.Supp.3d 311 (D.D.C. 2019); Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 6:20 am by Riana Harvey
This was quickly dismissed by the Judge, stating that the Hearing Officer had properly concluded that there was a low degree of conceptual similarity and that no point of law was to be found there.Turning to the second Ground of appeal, it was submitted that the independency principle had not been applied properly as per Canon v MGM. [read post]