Search for: "R.C."
Results 101 - 120
of 1,131
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2018, 6:37 am
But R.C. 2923.13, the weapons-under-disability statute, provides a number of different disability conditions, a juvenile adjudication being one, and R.C. 2923.13(A)(2), the juvenile adjudication provision, does not use juvenile adjudications as sentence enhancements. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 11:57 am
Pursuant to the current version of R.C. 2503.33, effective March 22, 2013, “The chief justice and the judges of the supreme court shall meet at Columbus in January of each year and at subsequent times throughout the year as determined by the court. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 4:31 am
Beck Energy Corporation (“Beck Energy”), obtained a state permit through R.C. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 7:47 am
Bd. of Revision, 141 Ohio St.3d 243, 2014-Ohio-4723, 23 N.E.3d 1086…, it is easy to surmise that R.C. 5713.04 is more clarification of, than exception to R.C. 5713.03. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 7:55 am
"The appellant did not dispute that its lease did not comply with R.C. 5301.01, but argued that the formalities of R.C. 5301.08exempts the lease from the formal execution requirements. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 1:31 pm
We are persuaded that the legislature's action in amending R.C. 2744.02(B)(3) was not whimsy, but a deliberate effort to limit political subdivisions' liability for injuries and deaths on their roadways. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 11:46 am
Myers Company (2012-Ohio-5317) that substantially limits the definition of “deliberate removal of an equipment safety guard” necessary to create a rebuttable presumption of intent under Ohio’s Employer Intentional Tort Statute, R.C. 2745.01(C). [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 8:32 am
The appeals court found that the statutory remedies in R.C. [read post]
28 May 2014, 12:01 pm
Former R.C. 5713.03 required a county auditor to consider a recent arm’s-length sale in determining a property’s true value for real property tax purposes. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 10:16 am
R.C. 5739.01(B)(3)(k) makes “employment services” taxable. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 11:06 am
The Supreme Court of Ohio ruled today that a plaintiff may, in the same case, pursue claims for dog bite injury under both the state’s specific dog bite statute, R.C. 955.28, and common law negligence. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 5:13 am
At issue in this case is whether Ohio’s statutory cap on non-economic damages, codified in R.C. 2315.18, is unconstitutional as applied to … Continue reading → The post Oral Argument Preview: Tort Reform Revisited. [read post]
11 Feb 2007, 11:24 am
Targeted at trial atttorneys, the article discusses the competing time restrictions between Ohio’s statues of limitation to bring a personal injury claim and a claim against a decedent’s Estate (R.C. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 11:01 am
The Ohio Supreme Court, last Wednesday, upheld a state law that imposes 10 additional days of mandatory jail time on a driver with a prior DUI conviction if that person refuses to take a chemical test after being arrested for a subsequent DUI violation. ( Court's Holding and Summary ) Ohio's DUI statute, R.C. 4511.19, sets a mandatory minimum jail term of 10 days for a repeat DUI offender who is [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 7:30 am
R.C. [read post]
6 May 2010, 1:08 am
The Supreme Court of Ohio ruled today that under R.C. 2953.74, a state law that allows prison inmates to obtain new DNA testing of evidence from their trials under certain conditions, a prior DNA test is not “definitive” when a new testing method can detect information that could not be detected by the prior DNA test. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 9:56 am
" During the subsequent medical malpractice trial, the statement was not admitted, due to Ohio's "apology statute," R.C. 2317.43. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 6:02 am
The Supreme Court of Ohio ruled today that a corporation cannot avoid its duty under R.C. 1701.13(E)(5)(a) to advance the legal defense expenses of a corporate director who is sued in his or her capacity as a director by claiming that the director’s misconduct, if proven, would amount to a violation of his or her fiduciary duties to the corporation. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 7:21 am
At issue in this case is whether Ohio’s statutory cap on non-economic damages, codified in R.C. 2315.18, is unconstitutional as applied to the facts in … Continue reading → The post What’s On Their Minds: Tort Reform Revisited. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 8:18 pm
The Supreme Court of Ohio ruled today that when a party in a civil lawsuit moves for a stay of trial pending arbitration of the dispute, and the trial court issues an order granting or denying the requested stay, R.C. 2711.02(C) permits an immediate appeal of the trial court’s order, even when that order does not include a judicial determination that there is “no just cause for delay” in pursuing an appeal as required by Civil Rule 54(B). [read post]
