Search for: "RA v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 332
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2007, 7:18 am
sobre un reciente fallo norteamericano, de la "Cámara Federal" de Washington, que vino a raÃÂz de una demanda planteada por una ONG para que se reconozca el derecho constitucional de enfermos terminales a acceder a tratamientos experimentales. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 8:00 am
Topco Asscs., LLC, No. 19-CV-11104 (RA), 2021 WL 168541, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 12:16 pm
(Mouvement Raëlien Suisse v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 12:16 pm
(Mouvement Raëlien Suisse v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 9:48 am
I work diligently to state the argument as clearly as I can, while at the same time objectively explaining each parties arguments. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 9:29 am
Nuclear Tests (New Zealand v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:29 am
AA (Nigeria), RA (Iraq) and HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022] UKSC 22 – on appeal from [2020] EWCA 1296 and [2020] EWCA 1176. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:11 am
Idaho State Bar ethical rules prohibit attorneys from advocating against their clients’ interests. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 6:01 am
With some recent judgments in mind in which the ECtHR, and especially the Grand Chamber, left a (very) wide margin of appreciation to the members states in relation to the assessment of the pressing social need justifying interferences with the right to freedom of expression (Mouvement raëlien suisse v. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 7:27 pm
Obama and President Raúl Castro. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 3:34 pm
Thus far, there have been two Chinese judgments recognized and enforced in Australia (both in the State of Victoria). [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 11:31 am
Věra Jourová, Vice-President for Values and Transparency, said: “We have listened very carefully to the concerns expressed by the Parliament, the Members States and the European Data Protection Board, in particular on the possibility of future divergence from our standards in the UK’s privacy framework. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 1:24 pm
Supreme Court in the case United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 9:35 am
jak Onassis v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 2:28 pm
---RA [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 3:12 pm
In most states, the priestly role has been transformed. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 11:44 am
The ra- tionale of this rule is that the nature of the dispute is something which has to be determined outside and independent of what appears in the award. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 10:46 am
While we haven’t learned much about the FISC’s legal interpretation of these two key provisions, here’s a brief guide to what we do know: Section 702 Title VII, Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), “Procedures for targeting certain persons outside the United States other than United States persons” (50 USC § 1881a) Allows for targeting of communications of foreign persons located abroad for foreign… [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 7:50 am
And looked to United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 11:29 am
In a press conference announcing the agreement, Věra Jourová, EU Commissioner in charge of Justice, Consumers and Gender Equality, highlighted these “binding assurances” given by the U.S. regarding “clear limitations” on national security access, and noted that the U.S. commitments would be subject to an annual joint review by the European Commission and the DOC, as well as national intelligence experts from the European Data Protection… [read post]
