Search for: "RICHARD SEEBORG, and as an individual" Results 1 - 20 of 29
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2022, 1:34 pm by Kevin LaCroix
District Court for the Northern District of California, Judge Richard Seeborg ruled that:   [T]he crux of the inquiry for the reliance element is whether each investor relied on Schwab’s alleged misrepresentations and omissions when conducting each particular trade. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 3:03 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  In his August 30, 2021 Order, Northern District of California Judge Richard Seeborg granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss, saying that the complaint “simply does not plausibly plead an actionable false statement,” and ruling further that the plaintiffs’ had failed to present allegations sufficient to establish that a pre-suit demand on the board would have been futile. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
“This case stems from an ongoing debate about whether hydroponics, a form of soil-less agriculture, may be certified organic,” wrote  Chief Judge Richard Seeborg for the U.S. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 10:37 pm by Schachtman
First, Judge Richard Seeborg cited and applied Rule 702, a statute, and not dicta from case law that predates the most recent statutory version of the rule. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 12:33 pm by Andrew Patterson
” Judge Richard Seeborg found that the policy was not in accordance with law because Section 235(b)(2)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA)—a provision that allows the return of certain people to foreign contiguous territory pending a hearing—cannot be applied to asylum seekers. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 5:39 am by Lindsay Offutt
In the order, Judge Richard Seeborg gave two primary reasons why the preliminary injunction was granted: First, the statute that vests DHS with authority in some circumstances to return certain aliens to a “contiguous territory” cannot be read to apply to the individual plaintiffs or others similarly situated. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 11:29 am by Peter Margulies
The March 6 decision by Judge Richard Seeborg of the Northern District of California in California v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 1:30 pm by Tom Lamb
This federal court consolidation of Viagra lawsuits was assigned to Judge Richard Seeborg, of the Northern District of California. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 10:05 pm by Coral Beach
District Court Judge Richard Seeborg that they would file a status update by Jan. 4. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 9:14 am by Dennis Crouch
The party at the Federal Circuit was kicked off after Judge Richard Seeborg of the U.S. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 4:19 pm by Erica Gann Kitaev
  Judge Richard Seeborg specifically questioned the adequacy of compensation to the class in light of the $750 per violation that would be recoverable under the statute at issue. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 8:46 am by Stanley Radtke
His sentencing is scheduled for March 19, 2013, before District Judge Richard Seeborg in San Francisco. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 12:11 am by Kevin LaCroix
As discussed here (scroll down), in January 2011, Northern District of California Judge Richard Seeborg found Oracle’s forum selection by-law to be unenforceable, in part because it had not been put to shareholder vote. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 7:19 pm by Anonymous
 Currently, SROs receive mail through "single-point" delivery and Judge Richard Seeborg ruled that was just fine. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 7:19 pm by Michael O'Brien
 Currently, SROs receive mail through "single-point" delivery and Judge Richard Seeborg ruled that was just fine. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 2:27 pm by Mike
 Judge Seeborg disagreed and granted the plaintiffs conditional class certification. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:04 am by Kevin LaCroix
The article neglects to mention that just last week Northern District of California Judge Richard Seeborg held that the forum selection clause in Oracle’s bylaws is unenforceable. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 1:11 am by Kevin LaCroix
  However, on January 3, 2011, Northern District of California Judge Richard Seeborg held, in a case of first impression, that a forum selection clause in Oracle’s bylaws was not enforceable, at least in the absence of shareholder approval. [read post]