Search for: "Rachael Lamkin"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2013, 7:54 am
Rachael Lamkin is a patent litigator who recently became Associate General Counsel at Blue Ocean Enterprises, Inc. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 5:30 am
Related posts:A Patent Troll Conversation – One on One with Rachael LamkinRachael Lamkin is a patent litigator who recently became Associate General Counsel at Blue Ocean Enterprises, Inc. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 7:24 am
A Patent Troll Conversation – One on One with Rachael LamkinRachael Lamkin is a patent litigator who recently became Associate General Counsel at Blue Ocean Enterprises, Inc. [read post]
16 Apr 2017, 6:40 pm
Instead, the company's outside counsel Rachael Lamkin sent a letter to Rothschild's lawyer, explaining that his patents on a "system and method for creating a personalized consumer product" weren't valid, and ran afoul of Section 101 of the US Patent laws. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 9:44 am
Motiv retained Rachael Lamkin, who replied with her own letter explaining why Motiv does not infringe, and why MHM’s patent is invalid. [read post]
31 Dec 1969, 11:00 am
Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2013-06-23 http://t.co/vRSDQDCXEl -> Pink Floyd: Pandora Internet radio royalty ripoff http://t.co/040FErsb17 -> Internet cafe supporters move ahead with referendum challenging new law http://t.co/3gscJpdsAW -> California sends a cease and desist order to the Bitcoin Foundation http://t.co/2i1Cn070Ta -> The CopyCat – tantalising titbits and techno tales http://t.co/Eazkme9DHW -> How I Found Copyright Infringement thru Google Images… [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 11:31 am
Jun 30 2013 A Patent Troll Conversation – One on One with Rachael Lamkin Jun 21 2013 Obama on Patent Trolls – Much Ado About Nothing Jun 04 2013 Is Patent Litigation Really a Problem for Big Tech? [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 5:02 pm
Otter, represented in this case by Rachael ("Bryan McCann") Lamkin of the San Francisco firm of Turner Boyd LLP (which means she probably really doesn't appreciate the Cowboys references) moved for "a procedural remedy directly aimed at preventing the extraction of settlements based on the cost of defense instead of actual damages. [read post]
