Search for: "Railroad v. Johnson" Results 101 - 120 of 130
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Edith Roberts
” Contraception In 2007, in In Re: Union Pacific Railroad Employment Practices Litigation, Gruender wrote for a panel of the 8th Circuit reversing a district court ruling holding that the failure of the railroad to provide insurance coverage for contraceptives used solely to prevent pregnancy constituted sex discrimination, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act. [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am by Schachtman
Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Co., 461 F.3d 844 (7th Cir. 2006) (affirming summary judgment in disparate treatment discharge case, and noting judicial tendency to require “comparability” between plaintiffs and comparison group as a “natural response to cherry-picking by plaintiffs”); Miller v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 6:00 am by Colby Pastre
As Justice Johnson described in 1824, these actions were “destructive to the harmony of the states, and fatal to their commercial interests abroad. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 8:30 am by Alex Phipps
In this Johnson County Case, defendant appealed the denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained from his cellphone. [read post]
Subchapter III – Continued Assistance to Rail Workers; Expansion and Extension of Benefits For Railroad Workers The legislation reinstates the “federal bump” for unemployed railroad workers in the amount of $600 per registration period, beginning after December 26, 2020, until March 14, 2021. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Series of Essays
May, President of the Free State Foundation In West Virginia v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 4:31 am by Dennis Crouch
Penney, SAS, Cisco, Johnson & Johnson, & Adobe, are testifying. [read post]