Search for: "Rand v. Rand " Results 21 - 40 of 696
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2012, 5:32 am
The district court disagreed: "Motorola's declaration to the ITU and IEEE constitute binding agreements to license its essential patents on RAND terms, and Microsoft is a third-party beneficiary to those agreements and therefore entitled to a license of Motorola's essential patents on RAND terms [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 6:23 am by Daily Record Staff
Contracts — Fraudulent conveyance — Fair consideration Appellants, Charles Rand (“Rand”) and Greystone Operations, LLC (“Greystone”), appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Montgomery County setting aside the transfer of a 2005 Mazda automobile from Rand to Greystone as a fraudulent conveyance and awarding title to appellee, Steven Steinberg (“Steinberg”). [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 6:14 am
"Rand Paul's Brand of Judicial Activism": Law professor Cass R. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 2:04 pm
Much less do you see that happen a lot when the party spanked is an attorney.But Van Nuys attorney Gary Rand learned today that it happens. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 8:35 am by Brian Cordery
the Unwired Planet v Huawei Court of Appeal decision cannot be read to suggest that an SEP owner always has a legitimate interest in seeking a RAND determination even when the implementer has foresworn any reliance on his entitlement to a licence. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 4:58 pm
In Geeveekay Pty Ltd & Ors v Director of Consumer Affairs Victoria [2008] VSC 50 , the Victorian Supreme Court decided that a terms contract of sale for land was regulated by the Consumer Credit Code. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 8:08 pm by Ben Sheffner
As first reported in the Louisville Courier-Journal, the libertarian-minded Canadian band Rush is battling the libertarian-minded Kentucky Republican Senate candidate Rand Paul over the latter's use of Rush songs in his campaign. [read post]
23 May 2009, 9:30 am
In the recent Full Court of the Family Court case of Rand and others v Rand, the court considered the issue of costs between the wife and 10 third party appellants. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 10:10 pm
" As explained recently by the International Trade Commission in Samsung v. [read post]