Search for: "Randi Siegel"
Results 21 - 40
of 46
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2014, 8:12 am
On November 3, 1790, the Virginia House of Delegates adopted a resolution condemning Secretary of Treasury Alexander Hamilton’s Funding Act of 1790. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 12:13 am
Friday night I attended the dinner hosted by Randy Juip and Ben Stevens. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 3:26 pm
We the People: The Civil Rights Revolution is coming out next week, and the Yale Law Journal will be celebrating its publication with a two-day Symposium on The Meaning of the Civil Rights Revolution.Here's the line-up:Friday, February 28:1:10-1:30: Introduction by Dean Robert Post1:30 – 3:50 Constitutional Change and the Role of Courts (chaired by Jack Balkin)Randy Barnett, We the People: Each and Every OneJustin Driver, Reactionary Rhetoric, Judicial… [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 7:48 am
Speakers include David Cole (Georgetown), Kim Scheppele (Princeton), Reva Siegel (Yale), and Rebecca Zietlow (Toledo). [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:40 am
The Health Care Case and Randy Barnett, et al. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:50 am
See Randy E. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 6:43 am
Commentary on the Court’s Commerce Clause reasoning comes from Neil Siegel at Balkinization and Randy Barnett at Reason (video). [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 9:48 am
As Randy Barnett and Jeff Rosen have recognized, the Chief Justice’s tax-power analysis in NFIB v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:21 pm
In a Volokh Conspiracy post, Professor Randy Barnett of Georgetown also said Siegel and Cooter seem to have "anticipated" the Chief Justice's approach in their paper. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 2:14 pm
(Randy Barnett) I have been out of town and not keeping up with all the chatter about the news that Chief Justice Roberts changed his vote after conference from invalidating the ACA, at least in part, to a vote to uphold it. [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:18 pm
” The case for a “collective action federalism” of this sort has been made at greater length by Neil Siegel and Robert Cooter in the Stanford Law Review, and by Professor Siegel on these pages. [read post]
25 May 2012, 6:53 am
Neil Siegel and others have offered arguments for upholding the mandate based on constitutional structure. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 11:20 am
Brian Galle, Neil Siegel, and my former colleague Max Stearns). [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 7:00 am
Or perhaps Randy is voicing a majoritarian view of constitutional law. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 1:42 pm
Not only has Balkin failed to rebut Randy Barnett, he has relied upon a reference to Roger Sherman’s principle which was expressly rejected by the convention. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 5:45 am
Randy Beck (University of Georgia Law School) has posted Fueling Controversy on SSRN. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:04 am
In a passage dismissing Randy Barnett’s claim that the framers ultimately rejected Resolution VI, Balkin writes:“[T]here is no evidence that the convention rejected the structural principle stated in Resolution VI at any point during its proceedings. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:42 pm
Frankie testified that he put everything in Randy's name, and Randy testified that Frankie and Siegel told her that they were going to make [her] the owner' of the policy. [read post]
19 May 2011, 7:37 am
Randy testified that the policy was taken out to prepare for her future in case something happened to Frankie and that Frankie and Siegel told her that “they were going to make [her] the owner” of the policy. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 6:48 am
You also have Randy Barnett touting a "Repeal Amendment. [read post]
