Search for: "Reliance Insurance Companies v. District of Columbia" Results 21 - 29 of 29
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm by Anna Christensen
HolderDocket: 09-1211Issue(s): (1) Whether Section 304(b) of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act is inapplicable to pre-enactment convictions of all immigrants whose convictions predate IIRIRA’s enactment, or whether the section’s retroactivity instead (a) turns on an immigrant’s subjective reliance; (b) turns on objectively reasonable reliance; or (c) is categorically inapplicable to convictions obtained at trial; and (2) whether the… [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 9:22 am by James Hamilton
Excessive risk taking by AIG and certain monoline insurance companies that provided protection against declines in the value of such asset backed securities, as well as poor counterparty credit risk management by many banks, saddled the financial system with an enormous unrecognized level of risk. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld that result, but on a different rationale. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 2:17 pm by admin
Gladys Kessler, who sits on the District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm by Contributor
The experience in other jurisdictions such as British Columbia and Australia has shown that draft legislation tends to be watered-down in the final product due to strenuous opposition to anti-SLAPP legislation. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]