Search for: "Reliance Steel Products Co. v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 27
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am by admin
In the third edition’s chapter on statistics, David Kaye and co-author, the late David A. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Richard Zelichov and Trevor T. Garmey
Securities Litigation, 768 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 2014) (violations of Section 303 do not give rise to private right of action under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5) with Stratte-McClure v. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 4:58 am by Schachtman
A-Best Products Co., 542 Pa. 124, 665 A.2d 1167 (1995); Conley v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am by Schachtman
Claims under Federal and State Racketeering Acts And Other Civil Remedies There are three types approaches to civil remedies a defendant might pursue to inhibit the flow of false claims in products cases. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am by Schachtman
”[5] This rejection of the clear demands of a statute has infected even the intermediate appellate United States Court of Appeals. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:18 am by Schachtman
The employer was the Bethlehem Steel Company, at the Bethlehem Steel Sparrows Point Shipyard. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher and David Moosmann
” Unlike President Truman’s ultimately unsuccessful attempt to seize private steel mills to assure continued steel production during the Korean conflict, Trump’s declaration was not an exercise of inherent presidential power but rather was issued under a statute, the National Emergencies Act, 50 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Aug 2017, 2:25 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
The United Kingdom Supreme Court recently considered the question of whether the performance standard or the design standard prescribed in the contract took precedence. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
That goal ultimately came to have bipartisan support in the United States, largely as a result of Selikoff’s advocacy. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 1:36 am by Marie Louise
(IPKat)   Australia Galaxy Tab 10.1: Samsung concedes another month in Australia: Apple v Samsung (FOSS Patents) (Patentology) (IPBiz)   Canada Ontario Court of Appeal: Domain name is “personal property”: Tucows.Com Co. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am by Steven M. Taber
Judge Levi issued a 2002 order granting partial summary judgment in favor of the United States. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am by smtaber
Judge Levi issued a 2002 order granting partial summary judgment in favor of the United States. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:15 am by Steven Peck
COLA stated that the matter would be referred to COLA's Contract Fiscal Compliance Unit for a determination. [read post]