Search for: "Rhinehart v. Seattle Times" Results 1 - 20 of 20
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2011, 7:47 am by Lisa Baird
  H.R. 592 would turn around the Supreme Court's Seattle Times Co. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Citing Seattle Times Co. v Rhinehart, 467 US 20, the Appellate Division explained that "an order prohibiting dissemination of discovered information before trial is not the kind of classic prior restraint that requires exacting First Amendment scrutiny. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Citing Seattle Times Co. v Rhinehart, 467 US 20, the Appellate Division explained that "an order prohibiting dissemination of discovered information before trial is not the kind of classic prior restraint that requires exacting First Amendment scrutiny. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 2:38 pm by Eugene Volokh
While the Defendants are correct that the First Amendment allows courts to restrict the dissemination of information gained through the civil discovery process, see, e.g., Seattle Times Co. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 10:25 am by Eugene Volokh
(Note that parties who get some confidential information from other parties via discovery may be barred from revealing it, see Seattle Times Co. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 8:51 am by Eugene Volokh
But in this case it seems likely that the individual defendants would learn the plaintiffs' names only through the litigation process, which might make the restriction on publicizing those names more justifiable (see Seattle Times Co. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 11:06 am by Eugene Volokh
(A party might be barred from using information learned via legally compelled discovery, see Seattle Times Co. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 11:11 am by Edward T. Kang and Ryan T. Kirk
This is more than just public policy underlying the discovery process; it falls within the ambit of First Amendment rights, as discussed in Seattle Times v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 6:28 am by Joy Waltemath
The court found no error in the magistrate’s reliance on the Supreme Court’s decision in Seattle Times Co. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 11:02 am by Kiera Flynn
Rhinehart, 467 U.S. 20 (1984), and Sorrell v. [read post]