Search for: "Rice v. Department of Corrections" Results 1 - 20 of 73
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2021, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Collins Rice J heard an application for strike out/summary judgment in the data protection case of Rondon v Lexis Nexis Risk Solutions UK Ltd. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 5:36 am by Mary Anne Peck
The equally Democrat-controlled Washington State Legislature approved SB 5768 , which requires the state Department of Corrections to purchase and dispense mifepristone. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:32 pm by M@jux-@dmin
Except as provided in § 4–305 of the Correctional Services Article, if a person violates subsection (a)(1)(v) of this section, the person is not eligible for parole during the mandatory minimum sentence. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 9:06 am by Randolph Rice
Except as provided in § 4–305 of the Correctional Services Article, if a person violates subsection (a)(1)(v) of this sectio [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 9:06 am by Randolph Rice
Except as provided in § 4–305 of the Correctional Services Article, if a person violates subsection (a)(1)(v) of this section, the person is not eligible for parole during the mandatory minimum sentence. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am by INFORRM
On 14 December 2023 there was a set aside application in the case of McGee v Lewis before Collins Rice J. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 4:06 am
Please direct corrections, comments, questions, subscription requests and inquiries to Mr. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:15 am by INFORRM
The libel trial in the case of Blake v Fox begun on 22 November 2023 before Collins Rice J. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Surveillance Reuters had a piece “HK security chief says communications surveillance can come under security law” Newspapers Journalism and Regulation IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 27974-20 Garrity v Scotsman.com, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation. 12131-20 Emmett v Daily Mirror, 2 Privacy (2019), 6 Children (2019, No breach – after investigation. 11860-20 Bunglawala v… [read post]
2 May 2021, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 29919-20 Hall v Express.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication. 28851-20 Tomlin v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after investigation. 27994-20 Odewale and Yadav v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2019), 12 Discrimination (2019), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 27841-20 Dainton v Bristol Post,… [read post]