Search for: "Richard A. Weiss v. the United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 73
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2023, 3:42 pm
In McDonnell v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 11:28 am
Christiani,*Richard W. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 2:25 pm
Weiss, Protecting Heritage: Weighing Politics and Law Forum - Jurisprudential Cross-Fertilization: An Annual Overview Ravindra Pratap, Geography and Legal Culture of ICJ Judges and Their Consideration of Erga Omnes Obligations Yoshifumi Tanaka, Alleged Violations of Sovereign Rights and Maritime Spaces in the Caribbean Sea (Nicaragua v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
Weiss & Ashley E. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Warrick, Richard J. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Warrick, Richard J. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am
For example, he raises and explains the problem encountered for causal inference by small relative risks: “Small relative risks of the order of 2:1 or even less are what are likely to be observed, like the risk now recorded for childhood leukemia and exposure to magnetic fields of 0.4 µT or more (Ahlbom et al. 2000) that are seldom encountered in the United Kingdom. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 3:15 am
The Department of State’s Division of Licensing Services Enforcement Unit (hereinafter the Department) then began an investigation into plaintiff’s conduct. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 2:35 pm
Valeska V. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 6:14 am
In 2018, the United States Supreme Court in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 4:44 pm
In an August 24, 2018 opinion in United States v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 12:04 am
Tarlowe +1-212-373-3035 rtarlowe@paulweiss.com Theodore V. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 4:12 am
United States, which asks when erroneous applications of the U.S. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 3:46 am
United States (consolidated with two other cases), which involves the effect of the dual-officeholder ban on military judges. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
But, asked Marie-Andree Weiss, is it right? [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
McIntosh, Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for amicus United States. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 11:00 pm
In the following guest post, attorneys from the Paul Weiss law firm review a recent Second Circuit decision on this issue, Waggoner v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 6:16 am
On [August 23, 2017], in United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 1:32 pm
”[16] The Decision in Martoma In United States v. [read post]
