Search for: "Richards v. U.S. Steel" Results 1 - 20 of 130
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2024, 5:50 am by Fred Wertheimer
President Richard Nixon’s administration obtained a restraining order against the Times in the lower court. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am by INFORRM
On 17 and 18 October 2023, the UK Supreme Court (Lords Hodge, Hamblen, Leggatt, Burrows and Richards) heard the appeal in the case of George v Cannell. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm by Legal Aggregate
(KQED radio program including commentary from Richard Thompson Ford) When the U.S. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:24 pm by David Kopel
The U.S. military uses the NATO designation, measured in millimeters. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am by admin
Putting aside the idiosyncratic chapter by the late Professor Berger, most of the third edition of the Reference Manual presented guidance on many important issues. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
In caselaw, lawyers and historians can rely on new historical evidence to challenge previous rulings, as the Organization for Americans Historians did in Obergefell v. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 10:34 am by Christopher J. Walker
  Speakers: Shalanda Baker (Director of the Office of Economic Impact and Diversity and Secretarial Advisor on Equity, U.S. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm by Eric M. Freedman
The Supreme Court upheld the action.When in the now-celebrated case of Marbury v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
First, Richard Epstein and Randy Barnett contend that Congress can only regulate the sale and transportation of goods across state lines, which furthers their libertarian vision.[19]Concededly, the core meaning of “commerce” has always been trade, but in 1787 its regulation also included market-oriented activities such as manufacturing, banking, and insurance.[20]The Constitution’s ratifiers shared that view, and early ICC legislation (approved by Presidents and the Court)… [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am by Noah J. Phillips
”[1] Chair Lina Khan has previously voiced her support for doing so.[2] My view is that the Commission has no such rulemaking powers, and that the scope of the authority asserted would amount to an unconstitutional delegation of power by the Congress.[3] Others have written about those issues, and we can leave them for another day.[4] Professors Richard Pierce and Gus Hurwitz have each written that, if FTC rulemaking is to survive judicial scrutiny, it must apply to conduct that is… [read post]