Search for: "Rickards v. Rickards" Results 81 - 100 of 125
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2013, 6:31 am by John Elwood
Rickard, 12-1117, involving the Sixth Circuit’s denial of qualified immunity to an officer in vehicular hot pursuit of a suspect. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:59 am by John Elwood
Rickard, 12-1117. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 7:39 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
Rickard 12-1117Issue: (1) Whether the Sixth Circuit wrongly denied qualified immunity to the petitioners by analyzing whether the force used in 2004 was distinguishable from factually similar force ruled permissible three years later in Scott v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 7:03 am by Mary Dwyer
Rickard 12-1117Issue: (1) Whether the Sixth Circuit wrongly denied qualified immunity to the petitioners by analyzing whether the force used in 2004 was distinguishable from factually similar force ruled permissible three years later in Scott v. [read post]
12 May 2018, 7:01 am by Rachel Bercovitz
Reflecting on the Supreme Court’s April 24 decision in Jesner v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 10:56 am
Schindler, Dennis Doordan, Marcia Rickard, Michael A. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 4:20 pm
It is fitting, then, that an act from an individual as unique and controversial as Dennis Rodman led to a unique landmark tax law case, Amos v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 6:16 am by Joy Waltemath
The appeals court affirmed a decision of the district court granting summary judgment in favor of the employer (Rickard v Swedish Match North America, Inc., December 2, 2014, Riley, W.). [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 7:19 pm by Mary Dwyer
Rickard 12-1117Issue: (1) Whether the Sixth Circuit wrongly denied qualified immunity to the petitioners by analyzing whether the force used in 2004 was distinguishable from factually similar force ruled permissible three years later in Scott v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 6:31 am by Mary Dwyer
Rickard 12-1117Issue: (1) Whether the Sixth Circuit wrongly denied qualified immunity to the petitioners by analyzing whether the force used in 2004 was distinguishable from factually similar force ruled permissible three years later in Scott v. [read post]