Search for: "Riva v. Attorney General of United States"
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
Over the last few months I had the opportunity to work with some fantastic immigration attorneys across the Southeast United States on a collaborative project. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 10:33 am
See United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 11:08 am
§ 841(a)(l) as defined in United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 9:50 am
Henry v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 5:01 am
Texas, 809 F.3d 134, 148 (5th Cir. 2015). 6 Kopan, Tal, Justice Department: Use 'illegal aliens,' not 'undocumented', CNN, (Jul. 24, 2018, 8:12 PM), https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/24/politics/justice–department–illegal–aliens–undocumented/index.html(last visited Oct. 23, 2021). 7See Alejandro Portes & Alejandro Rivas, The Adaptation of Migrant Children, Future Child., Spring 2011, at 219, 221–22. 8United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
WATER QUALITY Clarke v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
WATER QUALITY Clarke v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 8:08 am
” “‘Within days’ of the Sept. 19, 2019, receipt of the fourth letter, Houston and Rivas ran it by Reed Smith’s in-house counsel and the California State Bar’s ethics hotline, the panel said. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Santillana, No. 06-1276 A sentence for using a firearm during, and in relation to, a drug trafficking offense is affirmed where: 1) defendant was not challenging the reasonableness of the sentence; and 2) the circuit court generally does not review a district court's decision not to depart downward, and no exception to that rule applied here. .. [read post]
