Search for: "Robins v. Spokeo, Inc." Results 101 - 120 of 288
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2018, 6:00 am by Jordan Brunner
Standing Kaspersky claims that it has standing under the standard articulated in Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 6:20 am by Cullan E. Jones
  Rite Aid argued that Moore had no standing (and therefore no subject-matter jurisdiction) because she could not show a concrete injury under Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 10:29 am by The Editors
Chicago-based litigators Sarah Zielinski and Jason Chrestionson bring us an update on the issue of individualized inquiry and Article III’s injury-in-fact requirement under the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 10:12 am by robin.hall@capstonelawyers.com
Last month, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued its definitive ruling in Robins v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 12:08 pm by Hunton & Williams LLP
In a footnote, the court also found that the plaintiff sufficiently alleged an injury-in-fact for Article III and Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 10:31 am by Kristin Ann Shepard
The Ninth Circuit recently issued its latest opinion in Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 7:01 am by Ale Simmons
The decision was based in part on the Court’s finding that class members could not have suffered a concrete injury under Spokeo v. [read post]