Search for: "Robinson v. Fair"
Results 21 - 40
of 436
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2018, 3:39 am
The case of Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [1989] AC 53 is not authority for the proposition that the police enjoy a general immunity from suit in respect of anything done by them in the course of investigating or preventing crime. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:00 am
Domestic v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:46 am
Robinson had previously been stayed while the Supreme Court deliberated in a similar case regarding Alabama, Allen v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 12:04 pm
Robinson v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 7:17 pm
Blanch v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 7:29 am
If this question interests you, Robinson’s decision in National Petroleum Refiners v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:09 am
Robinson-Smith v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 6:32 pm
It's not every day that a federal court imposes Continuing Legal Education requirements as a sanction to attorneys in a case, but that is what happened in to Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach in Fish v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 3:15 am
To be fair, Robinson’s problem was not limited to the nine baggies of marijuana the police found in his van after it crashed; there was also the gun. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 8:33 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 9:15 am
v Pennsylvania P.U.C. et al. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 1:04 pm
Robinson, 560 F.2d 507 (2d Cir. 1977). [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 1:04 pm
Robinson, 560 F.2d 507 (2d Cir. 1977). [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 1:04 pm
Robinson, 560 F.2d 507 (2d Cir. 1977). [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 1:04 pm
Robinson, 560 F.2d 507 (2d Cir. 1977). [read post]
1 May 2008, 12:14 pm
Having set out its commonsense goal, the judgment performs some remarkable acrobatics to show that this view is either compatible with, or distinguishable from previous cases: Mohamed v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2002] 1 AC 547; Sahardid v Camden LBC [2005] HLR page 11; and in finding support in Robinson v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2006] 1 WLR 3295. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 3:09 pm
The same appellate panel that decided the controversial Berkeley Hillside Preservation case (which is currently in the briefing stage of Supreme Court review) rendered another significant categorical exemption decision in its recently published opinion in Robinson v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 3:09 pm
The same appellate panel that decided the controversial Berkeley Hillside Preservation case (which is currently in the briefing stage of Supreme Court review) rendered another significant categorical exemption decision in its recently published opinion in Robinson v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 7:09 am
ROBINSON, ET AL. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 9:05 pm
In this Episode: In this Episode: 1 Update on Smokey Robinson – declaratory judgment action 2 Update on Sherlock Holmes copyright 3 Update on EU Right to be Forgotten 4 Second Circuit Rules that HathiTrust Digitizing Libraries is Fair Use 5 Blizzard sues Starcraft II Hackers for copyright infringement 6 Magic Trading Card Suit 7 Videogame Composer Blasts Musicians Union for Rule-Violation Charges Amid Contract Strife 8 First Circuit Application v Registration with… [read post]
