Search for: "Roche v. Roche" Results 141 - 160 of 926
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2017, 9:22 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The patent is assigned to Enzo and is central to separate ongoing lawsuits between Enzo and Hologic, Gen-Probe (now part of Hologic), Roche Molecular Systems, and Becton Dickinson.Enzo originally sued these companies and several others for allegedly infringing the '180 and other related patents. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 4:41 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Kevin Noonan:ScottE: I was just discussing the reverse doctrine the other day, and here is a quote from Roche v. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 8:38 pm by Sandy Levinson
 Remember Roche's dictum:  Power corrupts, and the prospect of losing power corrupts absolutely. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 8:17 am by Liisa Speaker
Recently we posted a case involving bail bond agencies (Calvert Bail Bond Agency, LLC v County of St. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 10:02 am
No problem, here is the 124th edition of Never Too Early For Christmas References Never Too Late.Festive Feline Level 100Rocket in the Patents Court: Napp Pharmaceutical v Dr Reddy's and SandozThe case of Napp Pharmaceutical Holdings Limited v (1) Dr Reddy's Laboratories (UK) Limited (2) Sandoz Limited [2016] EWCA Civ 1053 was previously reported on the IPKat here (first instance) and here (interim application). [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 2:42 am
| Friday Fantasies | Meet the Trade Mark Judges (Part One) | HHJ Hacon amplifies the law on EU trade mark jurisdiction: AMS-Neve v Heritage Audio | Launch of IP Pro Bono scheme | Lundbeck v European Commission - a rotten decision or effective competition law enforcement? [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 1:33 pm
| Friday Fantasies | Meet the Trade Mark Judges (Part One) | HHJ Hacon amplifies the law on EU trade mark jurisdiction: AMS-Neve v Heritage Audio | Launch of IP Pro Bono scheme | Lundbeck v European Commission - a rotten decision or effective competition law enforcement? [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 9:37 am
| Friday Fantasies| Meet the Trade Mark Judges (Part One)| HHJ Hacon amplifies the law on EU trade mark jurisdiction: AMS-Neve v Heritage Audio| Launch of IP Pro Bono scheme| Lundbeck v European Commission - a rotten decision or effective competition law enforcement? [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 3:44 pm
Procedural fairness and the Penalties Regulation: R(Roche) v Secretary of State for HealthEibhlin Vardy brings us the second report covering the recent Monckton Chambers' seminar. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 1:22 am
The latter part of the presentation covered recent cases on medicines regulation, focussing on R(Roche Registration Ltd) v Secretary of State for Health [2015] EWCA Civ 1311 (although this English Court of Appeal decision was handed down on 21 December 2015, it may have escaped your radar due to seasonal festivities and/or the mad rush to tie up loose ends before the Christmas vacation...) [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:53 am
A further report on the second case discussed at this seminar, R (Roche Registration Ltd) v Secretary of State for Health, will be posted on this blog in due course. [read post]