Search for: "Roche v. Roche"
Results 161 - 180
of 927
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2013, 5:40 am
On February 22, 2013, in Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 9:43 pm
By Andrew Williams -- Last year, Sandoz filed a declaratory judgment action against Amgen and Roche related to its etanercept biosimilar drug product, which it developed to compete with Amgen's Enbrel® TNF inhibitor. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 10:42 am
SMDK Corp. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 7:45 am
The Federal Circuit, in Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 7:48 am
On Oct. 18, a unanimous panel, in Spencer v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:36 pm
LLC et al. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 10:31 am
Joseph Herndon: Mitchell International v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 8:10 pm
By Andrew Williams -- Last year, a panel of the Federal Circuit affirmed the International Trade Commission's (ITC's) grant of summary judgment against Amgen in its attempts to block importation of Roche's Micera ® peglylated erythropoietin product. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:00 am
Roche, C.A. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 8:58 pm
The conference will allow attendees to: • Devise strategies relative to the use of new PTO proceedings such as IPR in Hatch-Waxman litigation; • Understand how new 271(e)(1) controversies under Claussen and Momenta may undo Roche v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 10:47 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website, JURIST news archive] ruled [opinion, PDF] Monday in Board of Trustees of Stanford University v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 10:47 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website, JURIST news archive] ruled [opinion, PDF] Monday in Board of Trustees of Stanford University v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 10:48 am
Roche, 11-1146 (1st Cir. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 10:37 am
Finally, we believe that in the interest of fairness a word about the person who has his name attached to this case - Dr. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 2:42 pm
What's another way the judicial process can become a mess? [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 9:30 pm
By Kevin E. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 9:02 am
At issue in the case, essentially, was whether the extraordinarily successful Bayh-Dole legislation (enacted in 1980) automatically vested ownership of patent rights in Universities when the underlying research was federally funded. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 9:15 am
Roche Molecular Sys., Inc., 583 F.3d 832, 841–42 (Fed. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 5:45 am
In Stanford v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 5:26 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Kuzel v Roche Products Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 380 (17 April 2008) Manchester City Council v Moran & Anor [2008] EWCA Civ 378 (17 April 2008) TRM Copy Centres (UK) Ltd & Ors v Lanwall Services Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 382 (17 April 2008) Duffield & Anor v Gandy [2008] EWCA Civ 379 (17 April 2008) Dunn v Parole Board [2008] EWCA Civ 374 (16 April 2008) A v Essex County Council [2008]… [read post]
