Search for: "Rodgers v. Rodgers" Results 201 - 220 of 472
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2011, 3:29 am by Blog Editorial
On Monday 28 March, Peter Stewart v The Queen will be heard by Lord Rodger, Lady Hale, Lords Brown, Kerr and Dyson. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 12:21 am by 1 Crown Office Row
The panel consisted of Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 6:35 pm
The gender discrimination claim was also dismissed.The case is Schechner v CBS Broad Inc., NDCal, July 14, 2010. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:01 am by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal today handed down judgment in the case of JIH v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2011] EWCA Civ 42). [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 4:45 am by Janet Lindenmuth
Briefs for each case are available on Westlaw so you can read them in preparation. 10:00 AM      Christian v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 8:53 am by Dave
Reasoning Although Baroness Hale made it look relatively easy, this result was rather more difficult to achieve (as is clear from Lords Rodger and Brown’s judgments). [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
The Court of Appeal yesterday handed down judgment in the case of JIH v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2011] EWCA Civ 42). [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:06 am by Matthew Ryder QC, Matrix.
In HM Treasury v Ahmed Lord Rodger had specifically contemplated that if an order had particularly serious consequences it may be acceptable provided “that it had only a limited life-span and was replaced, as soon as practically possible, by equivalent legislation passed by Parliament. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 6:51 pm by Donald Thompson
A criminal investigation counts (see, United States v Rodgers, 466 US 475 [1984]). [read post]