Search for: "Rodriguez v. Miller"
Results 1 - 20
of 101
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2017, 9:23 am
My colleagues here have previously blogged about the impact of Rodriguez v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 9:23 am
My colleagues here have previously blogged about the impact of Rodriguez v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 12:44 pm
In Rodriguez v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 8:32 am
The Washington Post has an interview with Bryan Stevenson, founder of the Equal Justice Initiative, who argued the juvenile cases decided in Miller v. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 6:54 am
Miller v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 1:49 pm
” Stephen Gruber-Miller of The Des Moines Register has this report. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 9:43 am
In Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, a client was injured in a rear-end car accident and subsequently retained a lawyer to represent him in a case against the other driver. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 5:51 am
It has now affirmed the district court's decision denying the petition.The decision in Rodriguez v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 2:00 am
Miller v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] California Court Upholds First Amendment Right Not to Bake Cake for Same-Sex Wedding
6 Feb 2018, 10:24 am
& Hous. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 7:00 am
” And in Roberts v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 8:26 am
Finally, the Supreme Court just granted certiorari in Rodriguez v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 12:06 pm
Judge Miller’s ruling is posted on the Internet at: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Auth. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 1:29 pm
Our usual batch of news today is complemented by another few posts detailing the outcome of Miller v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 5:58 am
See Simon Clarke, Mitchell Riesenberger, Jose Rodriguez-Villalobos, Jeremy Seidman v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 1:53 pm
Rodriguez, back in 2014. [read post]
A California Judge Allows a Baker to Discriminate Against a Lesbian Couple Who Wanted a Wedding Cake
7 Feb 2018, 7:00 am
” And in Roberts v. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 11:30 am
In 2017, the Court ruled in Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 12:17 am
Graubard Miller et al., defendants-respondents
Subscription Required
APPELLATE DIVISIONFIRST DEPARTMENTAttorney's Fees
40-Percent Contingent Fee in Late Stages of Estate Litigation Not Unconscionable, Survives Dismissal
APPELLATE TERMCriminal Practice
CPL §210.05 Not a Bar to Prosecution Of Misdemeanor Cases in Supreme Court
People v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
Although Federal District Judge Gray Miller’s opinion in NCM argues that circumstances have changed since 1981, he did not grapple with or even cite the Supreme Court’s 1989 ruling in Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
