Search for: "Rogers v. Paul" Results 121 - 140 of 500
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2014, 3:11 am by Amy Howe
California and United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Posner, Trump's Lower-Court Judges and Religion: An Initial Appraisal, (Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2023-49 (2023).Paul-Olivier Klein & Shee-Yee Khoo, Paying for Religion? [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 6:01 am by Benjamin Pollard
Peter Margulies explained the Supreme Court’s decision in Biden v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Cohen, A Genesis of Conflict: The Zero-Sum Mindset, (17 Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution 427 (2016)).Ioana Cismas, Reflections on the Presence and Absence of Religious Actors in Transitional Justice Processes: On Legitimacy and Accountability, (Roger Duthie and Paul Seils, eds., Justice Mosaics: How Context Shapes Transitional Justice in Fractured Societies (ICTJ, 2017), pp. 302-343.Nuno Ferreira, Commentary on the Re-Written Judgment in R (on the Application of Begum)… [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 7:44 am by Dan Bressler
” “An unnamed Perkins Coie attorney was benchslapped by Northern District of California Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers for trying to recruit one of her clerks mid-trial. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 6:18 pm
PAUL, STANLEY MCMILLER, SEAN PALMER; from Wichita County; 2nd district (02-06-00348-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 01-31-08)08-0343 STANLEY V. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 1:50 pm
Paul Secunda has this post on the Court's grant in the LaRue v. [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 7:51 am by Alex R. McQuade
Robert Loeb and Helen Klein examined the Al Razak v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 7:16 am by Kiera Flynn
In Frederick, Maryland, a museum exhibit on slavery has been created in the home of former Chief Justice Roger B. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 1:32 pm
It is not one of the Supreme Court's great decisions, but Leo Sheep Co. v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 7:17 am by Allison Trzop
At Salon, Alex Seitz-Wald reports on remarks by retired Justice John Paul Stevens, who told an audience last night that the rationale behind the Court’s decision in Bush v. [read post]