Search for: "Rose v. Board of Education" Results 81 - 100 of 152
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2015, 6:02 am by Kit Case
Board of Education,” he retorted, invoking the Supreme Court case that led to school desegregation. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 11:54 am by Will Field
Board of Education (1954) and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which desegregated schools and outlawed discrimination on the basis of race. [read post]
17 May 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
Language Rights/Education: School EquivalencyAssociation des parents de l’école Rose-des-vents v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 8:18 am by Michael Klarman
Board of Education, a Supreme Court ruling invalidating racial segregation in public schools would have been virtually unthinkable. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 7:48 am by John Elwood
Board of Education of the City of New York, 14-354, in which the petitioner pressed a First Amendment challenge to the Board’s policy excluding groups engaging in religious worship from using public school buildings after hours. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 3:19 am by Kevin LaCroix
There was no discussion about when the risk of “potential incidents” rose to the level of disclosure. [read post]
5 May 2014, 6:16 am by Howard Knopf
” I suggested to Barry that he was looking at this through rose-coloured glasses and challenged him on some of the many issues he did not mention. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
C.A., Sept. 23, 2013) (35624) Apr. 10, 2014 Charter: Minority Language Educational RightsHow do minority language educational rights work in practice re schools and facilities.Association des parents de l’école Rose‑des‑vents et al. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 6:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  (Carol Rose has a great article explaining why she thinks this isn’t accurate.) [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 8:10 am by Ilya Somin
Board of Education, which desegregated public schools, and Roe v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 1:26 pm by David Cheifetz
Peel County Board of Education [1981] 2 S.C.R. 21;  Bonnington Castings, Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 9:19 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
The Charlie Rose suit, filed on behalf of nearly 200 interns, settled last December for $250,000.) [read post]
17 May 2013, 1:37 am
  Instead, ´what is critical is how the work in question appears to the reasonable observer’ (following Campbell v Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994) and Leibovitz v Paramount Pictures Corp., 137 F.3d 109, 113-14 (2d Cir 1998). [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 5:11 am by Jim Walker
Board of Education case, holding that the doctrine was "inherently unequal." [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 11:17 am by Lisa Whittaker
The University argued Dixon's speech fell within the presumption set forth by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in Rose v. [read post]