Search for: "Ross v. Superior Court" Results 61 - 80 of 153
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2016, 11:47 am by CJLF Staff
  In 2011, a retrial was ordered for Ross by the state Superior Court, after which Blair County District Attorney Richard A. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 11:24 pm by INFORRM
In Buck v Morris et al., 2015 ONSC 5632 the Ontario Superior Court of Justice dismissed a libel action arising out of a “Statement from the Town of Aurora Counsel”. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am by John Elwood
Ross Construction Co. for government contractors is restricted to claims arising out of property damage caused by public works projects. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 1:22 pm
Stennis to judgeships in the Los Angeles County Superior Court. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 1:46 pm
In Grand Prospect Partners, LP, v Ross Dress for Less Inc., Ross entered a lease in a commercial center in Porterville, CA. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 12:21 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
" Delay DamagesIn a case of first impression, the Pennsylvania Superior Court ruled in Roth v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
" Delay DamagesIn a case of first impression, the Pennsylvania Superior Court ruled in Roth v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am by Schachtman
The superiority of judges as fact finders in complex scientific cases remains to be shown. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 7:25 am by Jean-Marc Leclerc
The issue recently arose in an Ontario Superior Court decision called Garacci v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In a case of first impression, the Pennsylvania Superior Court recently ruled in Roth v. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 6:40 pm by Kenneth Vercammen
 at 536.]Apropos here, "[c]ross motions for summary judgment do not preclude the existence of issues of fact." [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 3:29 am by Peter Mahler
Indeed, the Delaware Chancery Court has invoked its “inherent power as a court of equity” to appoint a receiver for an LLC notwithstanding the lack of statutory authority, e.g., Ross Holding and Management Co. v. [read post]