Search for: "Rothman v. Rothman"
Results 41 - 60
of 245
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Pourshian v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Rothman, 2019 ONLSTH 75 at paras 149-150. [5] Law Society of Ontario v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 9:49 am
Americans for Prosperity v. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 1:05 pm
Mahanoy School Dist. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 7:06 am
See Cairns v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 7:42 am
Roberson v. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 3:25 pm
Jennifer Rothman Judge Robert Sack Prof. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm
On 1 February 2021 Rothman J handed down judgment in the case of Pan v Cheng [2021] NSWSC 30. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 10:29 am
Fair practice should assess fairness, informed by notions of economic and moral harm (which may involve considering amount quoted as well as nature/purpose of quotation as well as size/proportion); freedom of expression (expressive purpose of quotation, including political v. commercial; nature of claimant’s work); distributive justice (educational uses, translations, poorly financed creators); and custom, to a limited extent (drawing on Kenneth Crews and Jennifer… [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 11:17 am
Burnham, a Professor of History at The Ohio State, wrote a scathing letter to the Lancet’s editors, as well as opinion pieces in History News Network.[7] David Rothman, a professor at Columbia University, similarly took Proctor to task for his pretensions of doing “history” while testifying for the lawsuit industry.[8] Perhaps the most telling rebuttal came from Professor Alan Blum, a physician and anti-tobacco activist. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 11:17 am
Burnham, a Professor of History at The Ohio State, wrote a scathing letter to the Lancet’s editors, as well as opinion pieces in History News Network.[7] David Rothman, a professor at Columbia University, similarly took Proctor to task for his pretensions of doing “history” while testifying for the lawsuit industry.[8] Perhaps the most telling rebuttal came from Professor Alan Blum, a physician and anti-tobacco activist. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am
Bork v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 11:57 am
She relies on Kustoff v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 11:57 am
She relies on Kustoff v. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 12:43 pm
Jackson v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 4:12 pm
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of Cosco v Hutley (No.2) [2020] NSWSC 893 Rothman J held that lawyer Vanessa Hutley of Balmain had bullied her neighbour, builder Anthony Cosco, and defamed him in an A Current Affair broadcast in which she accused him of putting “my family through hell”. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 4:07 pm
According to the New South Wales Court of Appeal in the case of Fairfax Media v Voller ([2020] NSWCA 102), media companies are not just responsible for the content written by their journalists. [read post]
22 May 2020, 6:45 am
| US Supreme Court rules Official Georgia Codes Annotated is ineligible for copyright protection - Georgia v. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm
Rothman, Loyola Law School, Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles; Yale Information Society Project, Yale Law School The Inconsentability of Facial Surveillance, 66 Loyola Law Review 101 (2019), Evan Selinger, Rochester Institute of Technology – Department of Philosophy, Woodrow Hartzog, Northeastern University School of Law and Khoury Colle [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 10:37 pm
The phosphodiesterases 5 inhibitor medications (PDE5i) seem to arouse the litigation propensities of the lawsuit industry. [read post]
