Search for: "Roy v. Edwards" Results 61 - 80 of 88
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Roy Greenslade commented on the run-in between Sun managing editor Richard Caseby and the Guardian, picking up on Private Eye’s coverage (issue 1304) and addressing Newsnight’s claim that the Guardian’s Nick Davies had refused to appear on the programme alongside Caseby. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 7:18 am by Podhurst Orseck
The high court in in 2012 dismissed as “improvidently granted review” First American v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am by Roshonda Scipio
. : Bloomsbury Press, 2010.Civil RightsKF4155 .S77 2010Mendez v. [read post]
17 May 2015, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
Roy Greenslade criticised rival papers for failing to “congratulate” The Guardian on its win, accusing them of ignoring the paper’s role in exposing the memos. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:50 am by cdw
From the next edition: Relief granted Roy Phillip Ballard v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 7:00 am by Deborah Schander
Edward White is a great summer read for any lover of law and history. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
On 28 January 2022 Warby LJ refused permission to appeal in Wright v McCormack. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 1:39 pm by Andrew Hamm
According to Urofsky, this concurrence was far more influential than Justice Edward Sanford’s opinion for the court, which the Warren Court overturned in 1969 in Brandenburg v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Roy Greenslade, who ended his daily media blog for the Guardian in January, is to write a weekly blog for IPSO, which will be unregulated as IPSO is not seen as a publisher. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Gary P. Rodrigues
Roy McMurtry John Saywell The Law of the Land: The Advent of the Torrens System in Canada by Greg Taylor The Grand Experiment: Law and Legal Culture in British Settler Societies edited by Hamar Foster, Benjamin Berger, A.R. [read post]
31 May 2023, 2:01 pm by Guest Author
Previously arcane arguments over the constitutionality of the public debt limit now make headlines.[1]  At the same time, debate swirls around whether the President of the United States has the constitutional authority, resting on Section Four of the 14thamendment, to ignore the debt limit. [read post]