Search for: "Rubenstein v. Rubenstein"
Results 1 - 20
of 171
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2024, 8:26 am
In Sampson v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:55 am
Joseph Votel (January 29, 2024) The Just Security Podcast: ICJ Provisional Measures in South Africa v. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 6:34 am
Israel-Hamas War Israel’s Rewriting of the Law of War by Leonard Rubenstein (@lenrubenstein) In Defense of Gaza’s Hospitals and Health Workers by Elise Baker (@elise_baker) Senator Sanders’ New Resolution Could Force U.S. to Confront Any Complicity in Civilian Harm by John Ramming Chappell (@jwrchappell) and Hassan El-Tayyab (@HassanElTayyab) U.S. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
COVID-19 Pandemic Issues The Honorable Susan V. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 6:30 am
Supreme Court during the Court’s 1953-54 Term and was in the courtroom on May 17, 1954, when Chief Justice Warren read the unanimous decision in Brown v. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 11:11 am
Rubenstein, Newberg & Rubenstein on Class Actions § 6:25 (6th ed. 2022). [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 6:18 am
Based on the terms of the contracts, and as borne out in the record, the court concluded that the amendments gave the defendants no opportunity to abuse inside information in short-swing trading (Rubenstein v. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 6:33 pm
People v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 8:43 am
E.g., Cherry v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 3:03 am
Contrary to plaintiffs’ contention, defendants’ failure to comply with the rules concerning retainer agreements (22 NYCRR 1215.1) does not preclude them from recovering in quantum meruit (Frechtman v Gutterman, 140 AD3d 538,538 [1st Dept 2016]; Seth Rubenstein, P.C. v Ganea, 41 AD3d 54, 60-63 [2d Dept 2007]). [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 8:46 am
” [4] See paragraph 22 and footnote 24 of the judgment, referring to a Canadian case (Del Giudice v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 6:12 am
Cohen, TNJ Holdings, Inc v Rubenstein (Decision and Order [Sup Ct, NY County Sept. 13, 2021]), in which the Court, applying Delaware law, dismissed a shareholder derivative suit for lack of standing under CPLR 3211 (a) (3) because the plaintiff brought a mix of direct and derivative claims, the value of the direct claims eclipsing the derivative claims. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 4:40 am
Cohen, TNJ Holdings, Inc v Rubenstein (Decision and Order [Sup Ct, NY County Sept. 13, 2021]), in which the Court, applying Delaware law, dismissed a shareholder derivative suit for lack of standing under CPLR 3211 (a) (3) because the plaintiff brought a mix of direct and derivative claims, the value of the direct claims eclipsing the derivative claims. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 11:24 am
Johnson v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 9:39 am
However, “automatic” decreases and increases in child support and maintenance are improper (see Murray v Murray, 101 AD3d 1320, 1322-1323 [2012], lv dismissed 20 NY3d 1085 [2013]; O’Brien v O’Brien, 88 AD3d 775, 778 [2011]; White v White, 204 AD2d 825, 828 [1994], lv dismissed 84 NY2d 977 [1994]; Rubenstein v Rubenstein, 155 AD2d 522, 523 [1989]). [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 5:59 am
I thought that Roe v. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 9:30 pm
Tushnet: Response to Dirk Hartog’s Four FragmentsMia Brett: “Peculiar Jews: The Trial of Pesach Rubenstein and Antisemitism in Late Nineteenth-Century New York”Anthony W. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 3:32 am
Regardless, the complaint fails to allege that plaintiff would have accepted the offer if she had known of it (see Rubenstein & Rubenstein v Papadakos, 31 AD2d 615, 615 [1st Dept 1968], affd 25 NY2d 751 [1969]). [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:50 am
Regardless, the complaint fails to allege that plaintiff would have accepted the offer if she had known of it (see Rubenstein & Rubenstein v Papadakos, 31 AD2d 615, 615 [1st Dept 1968], affd 25 NY2d 751 [1969]). [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 3:47 am
As a threshold matter, neither Rubenstein nor Horowitz & Rubenstein are alleged to have acted as attorneys in this action, and Judiciary Law § 487 “applies to an attorney acting in his or her capacity as an attorney, not to a party who is represented by counsel and who, incidentally, is an attorney” (Oakes v Muka, 56 AD3d 1057, 1058). [read post]
