Search for: "Rubenstein v. Rubenstein" Results 101 - 120 of 171
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2010, 3:46 am
*The court also referred to the decisions in Matter of Karp v North Country Community College, 258 AD2d 775; Matter of Rubenstein v Simpson, 109 AD2d 885; and Dow v Board of Trustees of Farmingdale Public Library, 75 AD2d 632 in support of its ruling.There are a number of variations on the right to payment for unused vacation accruals. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 11:11 am by Sean Wajert
Rubenstein, Newberg & Rubenstein on Class Actions § 6:25 (6th ed. 2022). [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 3:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
""However, a law firm's "failure to comply with the rules on retainer agreements (22 NYCRR 1215.1) does not preclude it from suing to recover legal fees for the services it provided" (Miller v Nadler, 60 AD3d 499, 500 [Sup Ct New York County 2009], citing Egnotovich v Katten Muchin Zavis & Roseman LLP, 55 AD3d 462, 464 [1st Dept 2008]; Nicoll & Davis LLP v Ainetchi, 52 AD3d 412 [1st Dept 2008]; Seth Rubenstein, P.C. v… [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 3:12 pm
The Lahendros appealed that ruling and the Appellate Division, in a separate action [see 2011 NY Slip Op 07345], held that "individual defendants cannot be held liable for acts committed in their capacity as union representatives," citing Duane Reade, Inc. v Local 333 Retail, Wholesale, Department Store Union, 17 AD3d 277. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 10:28 am by Ronald Mann
It’s not hard to see where the justices are leaning in Frank v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 12:14 pm
Yesterday, David Rubenstein, a Washington lawyer and businessman, presented a 711-year-old hand-written copy of the Magna Carta to the National Archives, for a long-term loan. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 3:48 am
Rubenstein, Esq., ruled that the language used in the collective bargaining agreement controlled and thus the City was required to provide its police officers disabled in the performance of their law enforcement duties the benefits provided firefighters mandated by General Municipal Law Section 207-a.NYPPL [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 3:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Contrary to plaintiffs’ contention, defendants’ failure to comply with the rules concerning retainer agreements (22 NYCRR 1215.1) does not preclude them from recovering in quantum meruit (Frechtman v Gutterman, 140 AD3d 538,538 [1st Dept 2016]; Seth Rubenstein, P.C. v Ganea, 41 AD3d 54, 60-63 [2d Dept 2007]). [read post]