Search for: "Rubin v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 551
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2009, 2:19 pm
As a result, he says, Justice Roberts understated the costs of the rule when he wrote recently, in Herring v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 7:38 am
When the owner-government attempted to block the attachment, the court granted the victims' motion to force the government into the disclosure of all of its assets in the United States and to require it to appear before the court and affirmatively plead immunity under §1609 of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, 28 USC §1609.On March 29, 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Chicago reversed the district court with a detailed 41-page… [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 3:45 am by Peter Mahler
Baumann argued that, because the Operating Agreement is silent concerning the appointment or replacement of a managing agent, Rubin’s claim is governed by the default rule in LLC Law § 408(a) stating that management shall be “by affirmative vote of a majority of the managers. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 4:09 am by Nicole Huberfeld
Nevertheless, Professor Rubin has furnished a fresh take by proposing that the ACA expresses a legislative interpretation of positive constitutional rights that articulates a right to healthcare in the United States. [read post]
28 May 2012, 11:38 am by Poppy Weston-Davies, Olswang LLP
The scheme ran into trouble when the Attorney General of Missouri issued proceedings against the scheme under the state’s consumer protection legislation, and it soon became clear that other similar proceedings would inevitably follow. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 11:48 am by Michael Rubin
Rubin argued for the plaintiffs in Circuit City v. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 11:22 am by Emily Coward
Note from John Rubin: I regret to report that Emily Coward is leaving the School of Government. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 9:01 pm
Rubin of Washington, D.C., will argue for the petitioner, and Eric D. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 6:32 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Schwab of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania issued a post-Koken decision in the case of Rubin v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 1:14 am by Allison Tussey
Attorney Preet Bharara stated: “The charges unsealed today describe a sweeping and cynical fraud. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
Indiana, in which the court will decide whether the Eighth Amendment’s excessive fines clause applies to the states, and Culbertson v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 7:30 pm by Guest Blogger
v     What’s law got to do with it? [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 6:20 pm
Integra in a law review, but the quote was from someone else's blog (not IPBiz, or from JPTOS): footnote 29 of Samuel Rubin, Merck KGaA v. [read post]