Search for: "Rubio v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 166
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2020, 9:19 am by Steven Boutwell
  Businesses with greater than 500 employees and businesses for which the SBA Size Standards are stated in terms of annual receipts (without regard for the number of employee), may be eligible for a PPP loan if they qualify as a “small business concern” under existing law. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 5:00 am by Robert Klasfeld
Significantly, the Supreme Court has held that states can invoke such authority—within reason—to respond to a health crisis.In 1905, writing for the 7-2 majority in Jacobson v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 6:17 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This issue is discussed in the 2019, Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, opinion styled, Osiel Rubio v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 11:41 am by Jonathan Shaub
Rubio’s approach is possible; the Senate could vote on the House articles without any additional information. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 1:00 am by CAFE
Marco Rubio’s tweet about Bolton’s testimony, 1/6/20 United States’ Supplemental Memorandum in Aid of Sentencing, U.S. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 8:09 am by sydniemery
Shannon’s article Prescribing a Balance: The Texas Legislative Responses to Sell v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 3:03 am by Walter Olson
” Thing is, cooks and chefs aren’t licensed [same] Meanwhile, in Congress: “Bipartisan Bill Would Stop States From Denying Occupational Licenses Due to Student Loan Debt” [Boehm again on Rubio-Warren measure] “Judicial Sanity on Occupational Licensing and the First Amendment” [Ilya Shapiro and Patrick Moran on Fifth Circuit decision in Express Oil Change v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 5:03 am by Stephanie Zable
The complaint argues that the NDAA deprives Huawei of the liberty to sell to federal agencies, as well as by stigmatizing it and “discouraging other entities across the United States from doing business with Huawei. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 12:00 am by Scott Bomboy
(The second Article V option, which allows the states to propose and ratify amendments, is a bigger long shot, as it has never been successfully called.) [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 12:34 pm by Rachel Brown, Wenqing Zhao
Marco Rubio and Mark Warner sent a letter encouraging Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to “reconsider Huawei’s inclusion in any aspect of Canada’s 5G development. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 5:00 am by Hilary Hurd
The 2014 terrorist attack at the Kunming railway station did not amount to hostilities that might arguably trigger international humanitarian law rather than IHRL, as the attacks were not characterized by sufficient “intensity and organization” under Prosecutor v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 12:15 pm by Alan Z. Rozenshtein
” and you can imagine a moderate President Rubio or even a hard-conservative President Cruz supporting it, the answer is no. [read post]