Search for: "Rules of Civil Procedure v. Rules"
Results 41 - 60
of 14,074
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2011, 8:12 am
They did not seek individual compensatory damages for emotional distress or front pay, because doing so would be unauthorized by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23.Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, contains a number of requirements. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 8:58 am
The Supreme Court ruled yesterday, in Nutraceutical Corp. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 3:45 am
As we have discussed previously, Rule 54(b) of the Arkansas Rules of Civil Procedure allows a court to issue a final judgment as to certain claims or parties (when multiple claims or parties are involved). [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 12:35 pm
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] Tuesday that a forum-selection clause may be enforced by a motion to transfer under 28 USC § 1404 but may not be enforced by a motion to dismiss under 28 USC § 1406(a) or Rule 12(b)(3) [text] of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 5:49 am
The importance of the application of the Rules of Civil Procedure in a probate proceedings was evident in an opinion released by the Third District Court of Appeals, in Padron v. [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 6:07 am
House Republicans have reinstated "the Holman Rule,"a 19th century procedural rule allowing individual congresspersons to propose appropriations cuts targeting very narrow categories -- for instance, the pay of a single civil servant. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 6:39 am
(As a bonus, clean and redlines of the amendments to the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are also included.) [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 7:38 am
The civil penalties adjusted annually by the CFPB are the Tier 1-3 penalties set forth in Section 1055 of Dodd-Frank, as well as the civil penalties in the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act, Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, SAFE Act, and Truth in Lending Act. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 3:14 am
Glasser, the court analyzed Rule 41 (a)(1)(B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 41.01(2) of the Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:48 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Monday ruled [opinion, PDF] 5-4 in Turner v. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 11:00 am
The article tells the story of how the drafters were united in creating a rule that would enable litigants to respond effectively to the fierce resistance to desegregation following the seminal Brown v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 4:43 am
The Rules of Civil Procedure often have a few points where a case can end. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 1:20 pm
On April 29, 2015, the United States Supreme Court adopted the long anticipated amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
Rule 11 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure allows parties and their attorneys to enter agreements regarding a case. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 2:39 pm
From the decision:Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50 sets forth the proceduralrequirements for challenging the sufficiency of theevidence in a civil jury trial and establishes two stages forsuch challenges. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 10:46 am
AALS Section on Civil ProcedureCall for PapersThe Executive Committee of the AALS Section on Civil Procedure invites the submission of papers for presentation at the Annual Meeting of the AALS January 4-8, 2012, in Washington, D.C.The topic of our panel will be "Procedural Reform: Rulemaking v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 6:47 am
Jones v. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 9:55 am
"[W]e conclude that, where a party forfeits an objection to the untimeliness of a [Federal] Rule [of Civil Procedure] 59(e) motion, that forfeiture makes the motion 'timely' for the purpose of [Federal] Rule [of Appellate Procedure] 4(a)(4)(A)(iv). [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 7:26 am
There are undoubtedly many of the Rules of Civil Procedure that you remember by number. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 7:40 am
The question here is whether a motion brought under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) to alter or amend a habeas court’s judgment qualifies as such a successive petition. [read post]
