Search for: "Rules v. Appellate Procedure"
Results 81 - 100
of 9,836
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
We earlier blogged on the Appellate Divisions decision in Jalas v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 4:14 am
Vernon, the Appellate Division ruled that under certain circumstances negotiating a contract disciplinary procedure is not a mandatory subject of collective bargaining under the Taylor Law.Mt. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 11:06 pm
It's only for those readers with an abiding interest in the most minute details of California's procedural rules for punitive damages claims in medical malpractice actions.What? [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 5:41 pm
One way to look at it is to question when such a court can have unique doctrines that bend the traditional rules of appellate review to fit its own circumstances. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:04 pm
Brooks,No. 13-4448, the Court addressed a Rule 60(b) motion filed by a 2254 habeas petitioner who claimed that the case of Martinez v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 12:45 pm
" The Appellate Division then ruled that "the presumption is that all terms and conditions of employment are subject to mandatory bargaining" [City of Schenectady v New York State Pub. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 5:39 am
Jan. 16, 2007).In a decision discussing the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure’s application to the Class Action... [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:59 pm
Specifically, the question presented was phrased as: Rule 52(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that in matters tried to district court, the court's "[f]indings of fact . . . must not be set aside unless clearly erroneous. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 5:54 am
Criminal procedure — Md. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 1:38 pm
The post RICHARD O’BRIEN PRESTON v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 2:43 pm
In a succinct six-page opinion, the Supreme Court ruled today in Holguin-Hernandez v. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 2:00 am
Angela Williams, et al. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 2:10 pm
However defending attorneys need to issue discovery and seek a continuance in order to raise this issue in our appellate courts.The post Does the ten-day notice requirement in South Carolina Family Court Rule 14(d) violate procedural due process? [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 4:49 am
Nov. 6, 2007)(New Mexico).Appeal of district court's denial of defendant's motion to withdraw guilty plea.HELD: Because Rules 4(b)(1)(A) and 4(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure are not derived from any statutory source, they are nonjurisdictional claim-processing rules. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:54 am
Ammar v. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 7:19 am
The relevant rule is Rule 39 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 4:15 am
The Federal Circuit agreed with the lower court that Odyssey’s challenges to the USPTO’s rules and procedures governing ex parte appeals at the Patent Trial... [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 3:45 am
Billingsley v. [read post]
27 May 2021, 7:50 am
The case turned on the language of Rule 39 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, which defines the categories of costs that a prevailing party can recover after an appeal in the federal courts. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 5:34 am
In the recent case of Milambo v. [read post]
