Search for: "Runnings v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue"
Results 1 - 20
of 154
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2018, 12:28 pm
In that case, Lloyd, the petitioner, appealed an offer in compromise (OIC) rejection by the respondent, Internal Revenue Service (IRS). [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 6:02 am
A view of the Internal Revenue Service’s headquarters March 24, 2016, in Washington, DC. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 4:52 pm
Commissioner, 568 F.3d 767 (9th Cir. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 4:51 am
The Tax Court found it lacked jurisdiction because Terrell filed her petition more than ninety days after the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (“Commissioner”) sent her a Notice of Final Determination (“Notice”). [read post]
4 May 2016, 4:00 am
It is posted on the Internet at http://www.jcope.ny.gov/advice/ethc/98-12.htmIn Pagan v Commissioner of Labor, 53 AD3d 964, the Appellate Division addressed the disqualification of an applicant for unemployment insurance benefits following his termination for accepting a designation to run as a candidate for the State Assembly, ruling that his employment was terminated due to misconduct. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
My remarks reflect solely my individual views as a Commissioner and do not necessarily reflect the views of the full Commission or my fellow Commissioners. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 6:06 pm
Just a few weeks after Internal Revenue Service Commissioner John Koskinen announced the launch of the Annual Filing Season program (AFS), a voluntary program to regulate tax return preparers, a challenge has been filed in the U.S. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 10:28 pm
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent, decided December 2, 2009. [read post]
3 May 2013, 12:08 pm
Department of the Treasury; Steven Miller, in his capacity as the Acting Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service; and their respective agencies (DHHS, Treasury and IRS). [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 8:13 pm
British Columbia that, 21 Confronted with silent or ambiguous legislation, courts generally infer that Parliament or the legislature intended the tribunal’s process to comport with principles of natural justice: Minister of National Revenue v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:11 am
Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation v Commissioners of Inland Revenue and anor, heard 20 – 29 February 2012. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 5:31 pm
Drawback is defined as the refund of 99% of customs duties, fees, and internal revenue taxes imposed on imported merchandise under federal law including the refund of internal revenue taxes on domestic alcohol as defined in 19 USC 1313(d). [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:48 am
The legal distinction between domicile and residence Maksym v Board of Election Commissioners, appeal from 2010 COEL 020, #1-1-0033Rahm Emanuel’s claim that he is eligible to run for the office of Mayor for the City of Chicago will be considered by the Illinois State Supreme Court shortly. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 10:29 am
We can’t expect anyone, let alone the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, to agree completely with everything we say. [read post]
25 Oct 2006, 5:28 pm
Bissonnette, et ux. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:19 am
Running from Wednesday 14 March and scheduled for 1.5 days is Humphreys v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, an appeal from the Court of Appeal (Civ) to be heard by the same panel. [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:42 am
On Wednesday 23 May 2012 the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in the following: Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation v Commissioners of Inland Revenue and anor, Lukaszewski v The District Court in Torun, Pomiechowski v District Court of Legunica 59-220, R (Halligen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Rozanski v Regional Court 3 Penal Department, and NJDB v JEG and anor. [read post]
8 May 2012, 3:58 am
Humphreys v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 14 – 15 March 2012. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 3:05 am
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs v Parry & Ors, heard 31 October 2019. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:40 pm
We hold that appellant's service of a notice of claim began a proceeding in the Surrogate's Court and thus tolled the running of the limitation period contained in subdivision (c) of section 276 of the 1939 Internal Revenue Code. [read post]
