Search for: "Rutledge v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 270
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2023, 4:18 am
Rutledge seemed to admit to factoring in FDR's thinking in Rutledge's own deliberations. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 4:05 am
[Thanks to Tom Rutledge for the lead.] [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 9:00 pm
Thaler, covering certificates of appealability of habeas corpus cases from state court to federal court, and timeliness for filing for federal habeas corpus relief. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
Condor and Filvern v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 3:45 pm
(Finally) AA v London Borough of Southwark [2014] EWHC 500 (QB) This High Court judgment is remarkable in many ways, most of them worrying. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 5:29 am
State of Wyo., Dep't of Health and Maryland v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 5:29 am
State of Wyo., Dep't of Health and Maryland v. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 8:45 pm
Rutledge v. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 9:08 pm
United States, supra, 98 U.S. at page 164; Watson v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:36 am
Vaz v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 5:56 am
Rutledge, decided on October 8. [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 9:37 am
The Florida Appellate Brief Some of the state’s concessions: the state conclusorily disagrees with the district court’s claim that the law applies to entities that don’t resemble social media, but didn’t push the issue. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Irby Chair and Rutledge C. [read post]
14 May 2007, 1:05 am
Douglas Laycock, God v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 4:16 pm
Kelvin Rutledge, again rather valiantly, submitted an argument drawing on certain sentences from the judgments in Hammersmith & Fulham v Monk and Crawley BC v Ure but these cases involved joint tenants and were not relevant to this issue. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
I am in the process of revising my admiralty syllabus, and one case that I’m going to teach next year is Kotch v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 3:40 am
Five years after Kemp, in a case called Ingle v Glamore Motor Sales, Inc., the same court rejected a minority shareholder’s contention that his status as such exempted him from the at-will employment doctrine and allowed him to seek a remedy for wrongful termination of his employment. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 10:48 am
., v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 6:47 pm
In Carpenter v. [read post]
