Search for: "SAMSUNG INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. US " Results 1 - 20 of 223
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2014, 12:26 am by Florian Mueller
Based on that detection, the device uses either the plugged-in accessory component or a different input/output component such as the device's internal microphone or speaker. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 12:39 pm by Florian Mueller
In my previous post I published the dissenting views of Commissioner Pinkert, one of the six chiefs of the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC), from the majority decision granting Samsung (unless vetoed by the United States Trade Representative or reversed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) an exclusion order against older iPhones and iPads. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 6:46 pm by Dennis Crouch
Lexmark International, Inc., No. 15-1189 (unreasonable restraints on downstream uses) Biologics Notice of Commercial Marketing: Sandoz Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
GOOGLE INC., SD New York 2013 copyright fair use case http://t.co/8xpszZzNWy -> Samsung told to pay Apple another US$290-million for copying iPhone features http://t.co/3FNuJ0XoU4 -> Jay Z, Dr. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 6:31 am by Florian Mueller
Sept. 12, 2007) (granting stay requested by wireless carriers and handset manufacturers);Dynatec Int'l, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 7:55 am by Stefanie Levine
Last year Fractus S.A of Spain sued Samsung and a host of other mobile telephone makers in the Eastern District of Texas for infringing nine patents related to internal antennas for mobile telephones. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 7:55 am by Stefanie Levine
Last year Fractus S.A of Spain sued Samsung and a host of other mobile telephone makers in the Eastern District of Texas for infringing nine patents related to internal antennas for mobile telephones. [read post]