Search for: "SB v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,106
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2012, 10:05 am
United States on the subject of four provisions within Arizona's controversial SB 1070 that had been blocked in 2010 by a federal judge. [read post]
1 May 2012, 4:53 am
United States have been... [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 6:59 pm
Today, Texas state trial Judge David Peeples issued a decision in Van Stean v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 6:50 am
Judicial Watch, the government watchdog group, announced today that its client, the Arizona State Legislature, has been granted permission to intervene as a defendant in the Obama Justice Department lawsuit (USA v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:32 am
Roberto Cintli Rodriguez in Racial Profiling in Arizona: SB 1070 2(b) and Not to Be laments the Supreme Court's decision in Arizona v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 2:50 pm
In United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 6:59 am
As readers of ImmigrationProf well know, the district court in Arizona in United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 10:28 am
United States, a dispute over the legality of the immigration law known as “SB 1070. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 4:30 am
" This prohibition on federal courts enjoining state courts does not apply to Section 1983 suits because the Supreme Court has unequivocally held in Mitchum v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 9:49 am
" Pulliam v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 5:01 pm
The post How Narrow is the Pathway the Supreme Court Left for Suits Challenging SB 8 and Other Similar State Laws? [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 10:38 am
District Court Judge in Phoenix, Arizona, in United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 2:29 pm
Gonzalez v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 12:17 pm
United States, involving the constitutionality of several provisions of Arizona's notorious SB 1070 that the DOJ argues are pre-empted by federal law and which the lower courts agreed. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 4:58 am
United States. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 4:58 pm
United States on the issue of the constitutionality of Arizona's notorious SB 1070, signed into law by Governor Jan Brewer two years ago. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 5:12 pm
The legislative intent was to reject court interpretation of state law regarding the application of CPRA to auxiliary organizations, in particular CSU Fresno Association, at issue in California State University, Fresno Assn., Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 4:19 am
The Supreme Court, in Arizona v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 8:51 am
Cline, the Oklahoma Supreme Court held state SB 1848, a law restricting abortion, unconstitutional. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 1:43 pm
In the immediate reaction to SB 313's introduction, I tweeted that: "Am I wrong in thinking that the statute negates Omnicare, Inc. v. [read post]
