Search for: "SEC v. Medical Committee for Human Rights"
Results 21 - 40
of 44
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2022, 7:59 pm
District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division (EEOC v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 2:12 pm
Emotional distress damages are not recoverable in a private action to enforce the disability discrimination and accommodation requirements of either the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (“Rehab Act”) or the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”) according to the May 1, 2022 United States Supreme Court ruling in Cummings v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 10:20 am
Stamer also shares her thought leadership, experience and advocacy on these and other concerns by her service in the leadership of a broad range of other professional and civic organization including her involvement as the Vice Chair of the North Texas Healthcare Compliance Association; Executive Director of the Coalition on Responsible Health Policy and its PROJECT COPE: Coalition on Patient Empowerment; former Board President of the early childhood development intervention agency, The Richardson… [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 1:05 pm
SEC. 2. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 8:48 am
One of my favorite examples of this is one of the classic old CSR cases, Medical Committee for Human Rights v. [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am
Cherry picking is a good thing; right? [read post]
4 May 2024, 8:31 pm
Seilkop v. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 10:10 am
Jan. 27, 2016); Bartnett v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Zarda brought a claim in the Eastern District of New York alleging sex stereotyping in violation of Title VII and sexual orientation discrimination in violation of the New York Human Rights Law. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 7:01 pm
According to the Labor Department, misclassified employees are often denied access to critical benefits and protections, such as family and medical leave, overtime, minimum wage and unemployment insurance and other rights. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 11:22 am
The American Medical Association (AMA) recognizes that medical evidence in legal and administrative proceedings is critical, and that physicians have a duty to assist.[9] Testifying for a legislative committee would certainly qualify for a legal proceeding. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:52 am
There was a report of the hearing on Byline – highlighting the claimants’ contention that News Group employed a “medical blagger”. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm
See Schulz v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 3:21 pm
See, Businesses Must Confirm & Clean Up Health Plan ACA & Other Compliance Following Supreme Court’s King v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:57 am
" Lamie v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 8:56 am
” Walling v. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 1:26 pm
My own view is that they are simply short-term patterns that suggest nothing in particular about likely filing patterns in the months ahead, but only time will tell if that is right or not. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 2:16 pm
USA LLC, et al. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 1:44 pm
The Human Rights Department hopes to negotiate a consent decree, which would be enforceable by the courts. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
The Counterargument of Judges Brown and Kavanaugh In a 2010 case, al-Bihani v. [read post]
