Search for: "SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INCORPORATED" Results 81 - 100 of 449
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2017, 10:27 am by Chris Mirasola, Yishai Schwartz
And second, the court approves a set of minimization procedures adopted by amendment to an existing program. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 10:28 am by Shea Denning
While Rule 702(a) was amended in 2011 to incorporate the reliability standard from Daubert v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 10:28 am by Shea Denning
While Rule 702(a) was amended in 2011 to incorporate the reliability standard from Daubert v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 2:15 pm by Andrew Hamm
Only with the “due process revolution” of the twentieth century did the Supreme Court apply the Equal Protection Clause to the federal government through reverse incorporation of the Fifth Amendment. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 7:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Were it up to me, for example, all students would be informed about the rich history of Dorr’s rebellion in Rhode Island in the 1840’s and what it teaches about “popular constitutionalism” as a social movement and “popular sovereignty” as a foundational political theory. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 10:02 am by Alan Z. Rozenshtein
I personally can’t stand it, and I don’t agree with either its policies or its legal interpretation of the Second Amendment. [read post]
12 Mar 2022, 4:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
The flyer itself, which Hiers effectively incorporated by reference into his message, supplies important content and context. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 2:44 am by Lyle Denniston
Still, that sorting process has not been a promising one for gun owners and the advocacy groups to which many of them belong, the National Rifle Association and the Second Amendment Foundation. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 11:35 am by David Kopel
Bogus, The Hidden History of the Second Amendment, 31 U.C. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  “Racial hierarchy was as foundational to conservativism during the middle third/third quarter of the twentieth century as markets, communism and religion,” he writes. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 7:55 am
Justice Kennedy's finding of a "national consensus" among state and federal jurisdictions provided a foundation for his conclusion that permitting the death penalty for child rape is inconsistent with the "evolving standards of decency" by which the Court interprets the Eighth Amendment. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 9:02 am
But the judiciary could push further, if nothing else by incorporating Heller's holding into the Fourteenth Amendment and enforcing it against states and municipalities. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 11:58 am by Josh Blackman
Jacobson predated the modern constitutional jurisprudence of tiers of scrutiny, was decided before the First Amendment was incorporated against the states, and "did not ad [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:05 am by Sabrina McCubbin
” Addressing the facts of this case, Chief Justice Roberts writes that CSLI does not “fit neatly under existing precedents,” and that it instead lies at the “intersection of two lines of cases”—the first line addressing geolocation, and the second addressing the third-party doctrine. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
  Wikimedia Foundation (which hosts the encyclopaedia) does not involve itself in decisions. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 11:32 am by Benjamin Wittes
Second, what the agency is actually doing is far less threatening than what people think it is doing. [read post]
1 May 2021, 5:16 pm by David Kopel
For example, he addressed the American Revolution and the origin of the Second Amendment in The Founders' Second Amendment, addressed Reconstruction and the Fourteenth Amendment in Securing Civil Rights: Freedmen, the Fourteenth Amendment, & the Right to Bear Arms, and the 1886 Supreme Court case Presser v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:26 am by Emily Coward
The facts and procedural history of the case Evangelisto Ramos was charged with a second-degree murder in New Orleans in 2014. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:30 am by Erin Miller
At the Volokh Conspiracy, David Post discusses a SCOTUSblog post by David Cohen explaining a “voting paradox” in the alignment of Justices in McDonald, in which five Justices favored incorporation of the Second Amendment against the states, but through two different methods. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:09 am by Rebecca Tushnet
(I could see developing an argument that giving the artist/heirs the right is a second-best solution to the First Amendment problems of the first-best solution … but maybe if the best implementation of the idea has fatal First Amendment problems, it’s not a good idea—which the paper leaves on the table.) [read post]