Search for: "SELLERS v. WYETH" Results 41 - 60 of 67
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 “Where warning is given, the seller may reasonably assume that it will be read and heeded. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 6:51 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, 283 F.3d 315 (5th Cir. 2002), and  Williams v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
  Going beyond the terms of comment k, the Idaho court next decreed that “a seller next must establish that the product’s risk is in fact ‘unavoidable. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 12:29 pm
Herrmann represents Wyeth (which won't be just Wyeth much longer) in a lot of things. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm by Bexis
  In section 11 recall-related liability is recognized only in limited situations after a recall has already otherwise been instituted:One engaged in the business of selling or otherwise distributing products is subject to liability for harm to persons or property caused by the seller's failure to recall a product after the time of sale or distribution if:(a)(1) a governmental directive issued pursuant to a statute or administrative regulation specifically requires the… [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:30 pm
Wyeth Laboratories, 498 F.2d 1264, 1273-74 (5th Cir. 1974) (applying unavoidably unsafe standard without individualized assessment); Holland v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 12:12 pm
Wyeth Laboratories Inc., 734 A.2d 1245 (N.J. 1999). [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 1:37 pm by Bexis
Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, 385 F.3d 961 (6th Cir. 2004); White v. [read post]