Search for: "SMALL v. WAL-MART STORES INC" Results 61 - 80 of 129
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2011, 10:18 am by Elizabeth Burch
For claims that escape arbitration, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 9:10 am by Greg Mersol
The Court emphasized that it was not altering the holding in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:22 pm by H. Scott Leviant
El Torito Restaurants, Inc. (2010) 183 Cal.App.4th 723, 734; Dunbar v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 6:06 am by Gerald Maatman, Jr.
Plaintiffs’ lawyers continued to craft refined and more successful class certification theories to counter the more stringent Rule 23 certification requirements established in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 9:51 am by Arthur F. Coon
Superior Court of Tuolumne County (Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., RPI) (5th Dist.10/30/12) ___ Cal.App.4th ___ 2012 WL 5350450, the Court of Appeal granted a writ of mandate directing the Superior Court to overrule a demurrer it had sustained without leave to two causes of action of a CEQA writ petition.  [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 9:33 pm by Lyle Denniston
” Tyson is relying heavily upon the Court’s 2011 decision in Wal-Mart Stores v Dukes, which blocked the creation of a nationwide class of present and former workers for the giant retail chain claiming discrimination in wages paid to female workers. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 9:51 am by Arthur F. Coon
Superior Court of Tuolumne County (Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., RPI) (5th Dist.10/30/12) ___ Cal.App.4th ___ 2012 WL 5350450, the Court of Appeal granted a writ of mandate directing the Superior Court to overrule a demurrer it had sustained without leave to two causes of action of a CEQA writ petition. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 3:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 2017 IL App (1st) 171940 which effectively means that that case is good law. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 8:26 am by John Lewis
  The class certification issues involved provide the Court an opportunity to build on its landmark decisions, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]