Search for: "SMITH v. MERCK & CO., INC."
Results 21 - 40
of 53
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm
(formerly Merck & Co. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 2:49 am
”); Merck & Co. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:46 pm
Medtronic, Inc., U.S. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 10:09 pm
This long-running litigation involves a challenge by direct purchasers of K-DUR (potassium chloride) Extended-release Tablets who allege that Merck & Co., Inc. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 12:12 pm
Merck & Co., 929 A.2d 1076 (N.J. 2007). [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 2:16 pm
Case Background In Smith v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 10:56 am
This principle could certainly apply to innovator manufacturers as well in circumstances where the manufacturer could not make the proposed changes without government assistance.Mutual Pharmaceutical Co., Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
Glaxo Smith Kline Healthcare, 2006 WL 952032 (N.D. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am
Pfizer, Inc., 712 F.3d 21 (1st Cir. 2013), Aetna, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
See Smith v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:31 am
”); In re Merck & Co., Inc. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 10:16 am
Merck & Co., 894 A.2d 1136 (N.J. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 4:09 am
A-G’s opinion published – Merck & Co Inc. v Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt (EPLAW) (The SPC Blog) US: Supreme Court to revisit patentable subject matter eligibility of medical diagnostic methods: Mayo v Prometheus (Patently-O) (Patent Baristas) (PharmaPatents) (IPBiz) (Patent Law Practice Center) US: Intellectual property problems for personalized medicine (BIOtechNow) US: Supreme Court ruling in Stanford v Roche… [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
Merck (Vioxx) Trial2006-05-08 Doherty v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
Upjohn Co., 778 A.2d 829, 836-38 (Conn. 2001); Coyle v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
Medtronic, Inc., 128 S. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Oct. 24, 1996) Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Upjohn Co., 778 A.2d 829, 846 (Conn. 2001); Niemiera v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 6:07 am
In Smith v. [read post]
