Search for: "SOVEREIGN v. STATE ex rel. READ"
Results 41 - 60
of 79
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 am
Trump panel: United States ex rel. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 8:28 am
Unlike European countries which mostly rely on large and powerful government agencies to enforce consumer protection and civil rights laws, the U.S. has relatively small government agencies which handle relatively few cases. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 6:00 am
As I noted on Lawfare, the court ignored the most relevant precedent, United States ex rel. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 6:59 am
Preliminaries Perhaps federal sovereign immunity is a bad idea, for both ex post compensatory and ex ante deterrence/accountability reasons, though the arguments for both prongs of this argument are far from airtight. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 1:02 pm
The plurality acknowledges that most states continue to adhere to the public duty rule – and even in the relatively few exceptions, the legislature has in several cases acted to overturn judicial decisions abolishing or limiting the rule. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
We acknowledge that if you only read the first sentence of Section 788, standing alone, Mikhail's reading makes some sense. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 2:20 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 4:45 pm
” United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 8:02 am
U.S. ex rel. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 6:04 pm
§ 3582(c)), and even though the right to counsel applies to post-sentencing actions that affect time in custody (Mempa v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 5:56 pm
US ex rel. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
U.S. ex rel. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 1:04 pm
The trial court held that there is an absolute bar, relying on Clancy (People ex rel. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 12:22 pm
United States (1985): In Diaz v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 12:46 pm
Egan seemed to say that even by addressing the threat itself, the host state cannot moot, ex post facto, the claim of the intervening state. [read post]
14 May 2020, 6:30 am
It’s a fun and quick read. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Consideration of Hamdi v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 10:59 am
For example, in preserving the State's historical sovereign immunity from suit, Supreme Court cannot exercise jurisdiction over claims for money damages brought against the State, which must be initiated and tried in the court of claims. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 11:59 am
From today's North Dakota Supreme Court decision in Wrigley v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 9:55 pm
That also means that it will be as important for states to provide a means of training people to read and assess these reports as it is for states to develop the ability to produce them. 6. [read post]
